Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
appellate time limits and procedure.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law requires that a person seeking supreme court review of an adverse
court of appeals decision file a petition for review within 30 days of the court of
appeals decision. Current law also provides a procedure for seeking reconsideration
of a court of appeals decision, but does not toll the time to file a petition for review
while the motion for reconsideration is pending. This bill tolls the time for filing a
petition for review while a timely motion for reconsideration is pending in the court
of appeals. The bill establishes revised time limits within which a petition may be
filed, amended, or withdrawn, and within which an opposing party may respond,
following the court of appeals determination of the motion for reconsideration.
Under current law, if an attorney who was appointed to represent a client is of
the opinion that a petition for review in the supreme court would be frivolous, he or
she must advise his or her client of the reasons for that opinion and that the client
may file a petition for review. If the client decides to appeal to the supreme court,
the attorney shall file a petition for review that includes the facts and procedural
status of the case, the dispositions of the case in the lower courts, and an appendix
containing the judgments, orders, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and other
decisions necessary for an understanding of the petition. The client files a
supplemental petition containing the statement of the issues and arguments in the
case. The petition and supplemental petition must be filed in the supreme court
within 30 days after the decision or order of the court of appeals.
This bill prohibits the filing of a petition or supplemental petition in the
supreme court until after the court of appeals issues a response to a timely motion
for reconsideration of its decision or order. If a person filed a petition or supplemental
petition in the supreme court before the court of appeals issued a response to a timely
motion for reconsideration, the bill requires the person to file a notice affirming,
withdrawing, or amending the pending petition or supplemental petition, within 14
days after the court of appeals decision. If a petition or supplemental petition in the
supreme court was made before the court of appeals issued a response to a motion
for reconsideration, and that motion was denied, the bill allows the other party 14
days after the court of appeals denial to file a response to the petition or supplemental
petition. The bill gives that party the same 14-day period to respond to a petition
or supplemental petition filed after the motion for reconsideration was denied, or
after the petition or supplemental petition was affirmed or amended in response to
an amended court of appeals decision, after reconsideration.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Apr 23, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 99, Noes 0
Passed 99–0 Apr 28, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 4, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Staskunas, Turner and Townsend, by request of Wisconsin Judicial Council;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Risser
- Mar 4, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Mar 18, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 14, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 21, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 99, Noes 0
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- May 4, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- May 14, 2009 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing and rereferred to committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 46 (2)(c)
- May 14, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jun 3, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 6-9-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jun 9, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jun 9, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 9, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jun 9, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jun 9, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 10, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 6-17-2009
- Jun 19, 2009 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 6-19-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 25
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Published 7-3-2009.