Assembly Bill 132
A requirement that an employer grant an unpaid leave of absence to allow an employee to participate in an emergency service operation of the Civil Air Patrol and prohibiting discrimination in employment based on Civil Air Patrol membership
Topics: Aviation, Discrimination in employment, Employment, Workforce Development, Department of
Became law
The governor signed it on Oct 29, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 9, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed May 13, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Sep 22, 2009
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 56
Latest entry in the official record, Oct 30, 2009: “Published 11-11-2009”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law requires an employer to grant to an employee a leave of absence from employment without pay for certain purposes, including to vote, serve as an election official, serve on a jury, and testify in a criminal proceeding. Current law also requires a state agency to grant to a state employee a leave of absence with pay for certain purposes, including to serve as a bone marrow or organ donor, attend national guard or military reserves training, report for a preinduction physical for military service, serve on a jury, and compete in promotional examinations or interviews. In addition, current law permits a state agency to grant to a state employee a leave of absence with pay to allow the state employee to participate in providing specialized disaster relief services for the American Red Cross.
Moreover, current law prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of military service, which includes refusing to hire or employ an individual, terminating an individual from employment, or discriminating against an individual in promotion, in compensation, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the individual is or applies to be a member of the U.S. armed forces, the state defense force, the national guard, or any reserve component of the U.S. armed forces or because the individual performs, has performed, applies to perform, or has an obligation to perform service in the U.S. armed forces, the state defense force, the national guard, or any reserve component of the U.S. armed forces.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill requires an employer employing at least 11 individuals on a permanent basis to grant a leave of absence without pay of not more than five consecutive workdays or more than 15 workdays in a year to an employee to allow the employee to participate in an emergency service operation of the Civil Air Patrol, that is, a search and rescue mission, an operation to provide disaster relief or humanitarian services, or an operation in support of the U.S. air force, if all of the following apply:
1. The employee is a member of the Civil Air Patrol.
2. Prior to the emergency service operation, the employee notifies the employer in writing that the employee is a member of the Civil Air Patrol.
3. For an emergency service operation that begins before the employee is required to report for work, the employee provides a written statement from the employee's commander certifying that the employee was participating in an emergency service operation at the time of the leave of absence, if required by the employer.
4. For an emergency service operation that begins after the employee reports for work, the employee, in addition to providing that written statement if required by the employer, secures authorization from the employer to leave work before leaving to participate in the emergency service operation.
5. The leave of absence does not unduly disrupt the operations of the employer.
In addition, the bill prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of membership in the Civil Air Patrol. Specifically, the bill prohibits an employer or any other person from: 1) refusing to hire or employ an individual, terminating an individual from employment, or discriminating against an individual in promotion, in compensation, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the individual is or applies to be a member of the Civil Air Patrol or because the individual performs, has performed, applies to perform, or has an obligation to perform service in the Civil Air Patrol; and 2) printing or circulating any statement, advertisement, or publication, or using any form or application for employment or making any inquiry in connection with prospective employment, that implies or expresses any limitation, specification, or discrimination with respect to an individual or any intent to make such a limitation, specification, or discrimination because the individual is or applies to be a member of the Civil Air Patrol or because the individual performs, has performed, applies to perform, or has an obligation to perform service in the Civil Air Patrol.
The bill also prohibits an employer or other person from interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of the right of an employee to take a leave of absence to participate in an emergency service operation of the Civil Air Patrol and from discharging or discriminating against an employee in promotion, in compensation, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment for taking such a leave of absence; opposing a discharge or discrimination in violation of the bill;
filing a complaint or attempting to enforce a right under the bill; or testifying or assisting in any action or proceeding to enforce a right under the bill.
An employee whose right to take a leave of absence to participate in an emergency service operation of the Civil Air Patrol is interfered with, restrained, or denied or who is refused employment, terminated, discharged, or discriminated against in violation of the bill may file a complaint with the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), and DWD must process the complaint in the same manner that employment discrimination complaints are processed under current law. If DWD finds that an employer or other person has interfered with, restrained, or denied the right of an employee to take a leave of absence to participate in an emergency service operation of the Civil Air Patrol or has refused employment to, terminated, discharged, or discriminated against an employee in violation of the bill, DWD may order the employer or other person to take action to remedy the violation, including granting that leave of absence, reinstating the employee, providing compensation in lieu of reinstatement, providing back pay accrued not more than two years before the complaint was filed, and paying reasonable actual costs and attorney fees to the complainant.
Who's behind it
13 representatives are its . 10 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (13)
- Scott Gunderson · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Huebsch · Republican, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Murtha · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Suder · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Dan Kapanke · Republican, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · May 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Sep 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Oct 30, 2009
The new law was published.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 56.
-
Oct 27, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Senate passed it too.
-
Sep 3, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Aug 18, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 18, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.
-
May 13, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
May 13, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
May 5, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 5, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Apr 9, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 23, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 20, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 9, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security.
-
Mar 9, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Huebsch, Murtha, Pasch, Suder, Schneider, Mursau, Petersen, Gunderson, Townsend, Kessler, Spanbauer, Vos and Lothian;Cosponsored by Senators Kapanke, Vinehout, Taylor and Kedzie
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security
- Mar 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Rules
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- May 18, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Aug 18, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 2, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 10-27-2009
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 10-28-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 56
- Oct 30, 2009 · Assembly
Published 11-11-2009
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote