Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 134

The extension for objecting to property tax assessments

Topics: Court, Evidence, Municipality: Ordinance, Municipality: Taxation, Property tax: Assessment

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 9, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, pursuant to 2007 Wisconsin Act 86 , a taxation district board of review (board) must grant a taxpayer a 60-day extension for a hearing of the taxpayer's objection to a changed assessment, if the taxation district has enacted an ordinance authorizing such extensions and if the taxpayer submits a request for the extension along with the objection and payment of a $100 fee. In addition, if the taxation district has enacted an ordinance authorizing extensions, each taxpayer who submits an objection, regardless of whether the taxpayer has requested an extension, and the assessor must present to the board all evidence, as specified by the Department of Revenue in its assessment manual, to support their respective positions related to the assessment. At least ten days before the hearing on the objection, the taxpayer and the assessor must simultaneously exchange all evidence that each one will present at the hearing.

Under current law, if the taxpayer appeals the board's decision to the court and the court finds an error in the board's proceedings that void the assessment, the court shall remand the assessment to the board to determine the assessment based on the court's order. If the taxpayer challenges the board's value determination, the court presumes that the board's valuation is correct, except that the presumption may be rebutted by a sufficient showing by the taxpayer that the valuation is incorrect. If the presumption is rebutted, the court determines the assessment based on the record before the board, except that the court may consider evidence that was not available at the time of the hearing before the board or that the board refused to consider.

Read the full summary

In January 2009, a Milwaukee County court held that the ordinance and objection provisions of 2007 Wisconsin Act 86 were unconstitutional because those provisions prevented some property owners from getting a full court review of disputed assessments. This bill eliminates the changes made by 2007 Wisconsin Act 86 related to objecting to property tax assessments.

Who's behind it

5 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (1)

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 9, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  3. Mar 9, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vukmir, Kramer, Townsend, Nass and Murtha;Cosponsored by Senator Lazich

  2. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor