Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 135

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

allowing an individual income tax deduction for certain amounts contributed by a divorced or legally separated parent to his or her child's college savings account or college tuition and expenses program and limiting the deduction that may be claimed by a married person who files separately.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, there is a college tuition and expenses program, commonly

referred to as "EdVest I," under which a contributor may purchase "tuition units"

that can be used to pay qualified educational costs on behalf of a beneficiary. The

purchase of the units is limited to parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, legal

guardians, trusts created on behalf of a beneficiary, or individuals purchasing units

for their own use. Contributions made to an account set up under the program, up

to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be deducted from a

contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if the beneficiary

of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's child and the

claimant's dependent under the Internal Revenue Code; the claimant's grandchild;

the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.

Also, under current law, there exists a college savings program, commonly

referred to as "EdVest II," under which anyone may open an account for a prospective

student, regardless of the contributor's relationship to the beneficiary. Individuals

may open accounts for themselves, and a prospective student may be the beneficiary

of more than one college savings account. Contributions made to an account set up

under the program, up to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be

deducted from a contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if

the beneficiary of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's

child and the claimant's dependent under the Internal Revenue Code; the claimant's

grandchild; the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.

Under this bill, an income tax deduction for amounts contributed to both

EdVest I and EdVest II may be claimed by a divorced or legally separated parent of

a child. The deduction may be claimed without regard to whether the child is his or

her dependent.

Currently, the total amount for which a deduction may be claimed under EdVest

I and EdVest II, per beneficiary, by any claimant, may not exceed $3,000 each year

and, in the case of a married couple filing a joint return, the total annual deduction

under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed by the married couple may not

exceed $3,000.

Under the bill, the total annual deduction under these two programs, per

beneficiary, claimed by married parents who file jointly or separately, or by the

divorced or legally separated parents of a child, may not exceed $3,000. The total

annual deduction under the bill, under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed

by a married person who files separately may not exceed $1,500 per claimant. The

total annual deduction under the bill, under these two programs, per beneficiary,

claimed by a formerly married couple may not exceed a total of $3,000, or $1,500 per

claimant, except that the former couple's divorce judgment may specify a different

division of the $3,000 maximum that may be claimed by each former spouse.

Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Cullen (D) , Fields (D) , Kaufert (R) , Kestell (R) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Nass (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Suder (R) , Vos (R) , Zepnick (D)

11 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Grothman (R) , Holperin (D) , Kedzie (R) , Kreitlow (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Olsen (R) , Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0

Passed 11–0 Nov 24, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 17, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Roys, Cullen, Nass, Berceau, Suder, Vos, Richards, Kaufert, Smith, Pope-Roberts, Bies, Zepnick, Kestell and Fields;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Taylor, Kreitlow, Holperin, Darling, Lehman, Erpenbach, Plale, Grothman, Olsen and Kedzie

  2. Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr. and Roys

  5. Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr. and Roys

  7. Oct 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 3 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  8. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions

  10. Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  11. Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  12. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  13. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules

  15. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 3 adopted

  17. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Mar 8, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance

  23. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1