Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
allowing an individual income tax deduction for certain amounts contributed by a divorced or legally separated parent to his or her child's college savings account or college tuition and expenses program and limiting the deduction that may be claimed by a married person who files separately.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, there is a college tuition and expenses program, commonly
referred to as "EdVest I," under which a contributor may purchase "tuition units"
that can be used to pay qualified educational costs on behalf of a beneficiary. The
purchase of the units is limited to parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, legal
guardians, trusts created on behalf of a beneficiary, or individuals purchasing units
for their own use. Contributions made to an account set up under the program, up
to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be deducted from a
contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if the beneficiary
of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's child and the
claimant's dependent under the Internal Revenue Code; the claimant's grandchild;
the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.
Also, under current law, there exists a college savings program, commonly
referred to as "EdVest II," under which anyone may open an account for a prospective
student, regardless of the contributor's relationship to the beneficiary. Individuals
may open accounts for themselves, and a prospective student may be the beneficiary
of more than one college savings account. Contributions made to an account set up
under the program, up to a limit of $3,000 each year for each beneficiary, may be
deducted from a contributor's income in the calculation of his or her income taxes if
the beneficiary of the account is one of the following: the claimant; the claimant's
child and the claimant's dependent under the Internal Revenue Code; the claimant's
grandchild; the claimant's great-grandchild; or the claimant's niece or nephew.
Under this bill, an income tax deduction for amounts contributed to both
EdVest I and EdVest II may be claimed by a divorced or legally separated parent of
a child. The deduction may be claimed without regard to whether the child is his or
her dependent.
Currently, the total amount for which a deduction may be claimed under EdVest
I and EdVest II, per beneficiary, by any claimant, may not exceed $3,000 each year
and, in the case of a married couple filing a joint return, the total annual deduction
under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed by the married couple may not
exceed $3,000.
Under the bill, the total annual deduction under these two programs, per
beneficiary, claimed by married parents who file jointly or separately, or by the
divorced or legally separated parents of a child, may not exceed $3,000. The total
annual deduction under the bill, under these two programs, per beneficiary, claimed
by a married person who files separately may not exceed $1,500 per claimant. The
total annual deduction under the bill, under these two programs, per beneficiary,
claimed by a formerly married couple may not exceed a total of $3,000, or $1,500 per
claimant, except that the former couple's divorce judgment may specify a different
division of the $3,000 maximum that may be claimed by each former spouse.
Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0
Passed 11–0 Nov 24, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Feb 17, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Roys, Cullen, Nass, Berceau, Suder, Vos, Richards, Kaufert, Smith, Pope-Roberts, Bies, Zepnick, Kestell and Fields;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Taylor, Kreitlow, Holperin, Darling, Lehman, Erpenbach, Plale, Grothman, Olsen and Kedzie
- Mar 9, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities
- Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 6, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr. and Roys
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representatives Molepske Jr. and Roys
- Oct 28, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 3 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions
- Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report of joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 3 adopted
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1