Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 151

Drunk driving penalties, consumption reports, and intoxicated driver deterrence

Topics: Drunken driving, Fines, Forfeiture, Implied consent or alcohol concentration, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Motor vehicle: Equipment, Newspaper and magazine, Sentences and penalties, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 17, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes regarding the operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated or under the influence of a controlled substance (OWI), including the following:

1. Currently, an occupational license is issued for limited purposes to persons who do not have a regular license to operate a motor vehicle because that license is suspended or revoked. Under current law, if an occupational license applicant's suspension or revocation is because of an OWI offense and the OWI offense is the person's second OWI offense, the occupational license restricts the person to operating a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. This bill requires the occupational license to restrict the person to operating a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device after the first OWI offense.

Read the full summary

2. Currently, a person who commits an OWI offense is required to submit to an assessment of the offender's use of an intoxicant. If the assessing facility determines that the offender needs treatment, it submits a report of the assessment and driver safety plan to the offender, the county agency involved in alcohol treatment, and the Department of Transportation (DOT). The driver safety plan may require treatment for the offender's misuse of intoxicants or controlled substances and attendance at a traffic safety school. This bill requires the driver safety plan to include treatment for the offender's misuse of intoxicants or controlled substances or attendance at a traffic safety school, or both, if the offender has more than one OWI offense.

3. Under current law, if a person who commits an OWI offense, including a refusal to submit to a test to determine his or her blood alcohol concentration (BAC), has one or more previous OWI offenses, the court may order that the vehicle used during the offense be immobilized or that the offender's operating privilege be limited to driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. This bill removes the option of immobilization of the motor vehicle. Instead, the bill allows the court, as part of the penalty for a first OWI offense in which the offender had a BAC of 0.12 or more, to restrict the offender's operating privilege to driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. The bill also requires the court to restrict the offender's operating privilege to driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device if the person has one or more previous OWI offenses.

4. Current law requires the DOT to tabulate and analyze all accident reports and not less than annually publish statistical information about the number and circumstances of traffic accidents. This bill requires DOT to publish that information at least monthly and requires that the information include the number of accidents in which the consumption of intoxicants or controlled substances were contributing factors and the amount of intoxicants or controlled substances that were in the blood of the drivers involved in those accidents.

5. The bill changes the operating privilege restrictions and monetary and imprisonment penalties for OWI offenses as follows:

- See PDF for table Under the bill, each time DOT receives a record of conviction from a court showing that a person has been convicted of OWI, DOT must publish a notice in the official newspaper of the county where the conviction occurred or the person resides containing the person's name, age, and last-known residence address and the person's total number of OWI convictions.

Who's behind it

3 representatives are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 4 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 17, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 1, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Mar 17, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety.

  6. Mar 17, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Zepnick, Hixson and Bies;Cosponsored by Senator Sullivan

  2. Mar 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety

  3. Apr 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate