Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 156

Reimbursement to counties by prisoners and increasing drunk driving penalties

Topics: County: Finance, Court: Procedure, Drunken driving, Fines, Jail, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Sentences and penalties, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 19, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The bill changes the monetary and imprisonment penalties for operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant or controlled substance offenses (OWI) as follows:

- See PDF for table To determine the number of previous OWI offenses under current law, the court counts the number of convictions during the person's lifetime of OWI-related offenses that resulted in injury or death plus the number of suspensions, revocations, and convictions for violations related to OWI, except that for second offenses, only the number of suspensions, revocations, and convictions related to OWI violations within any 10-year period are counted. Under the bill, the court counts the number of convictions during the person's lifetime of OWI-related offenses that resulted in injury or death plus the number of suspensions, revocations and other convictions of violations related to OWI within the 10 years immediately preceding the current violation.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a county may seek reimbursement from a person who was confined to the county jail for the actual per-day cost of maintaining the person in the jail, for the cost of investigating the person's financial status, and for other county expenses related to collecting the reimbursement. Under this bill, if the county decides to seek reimbursement from a person who was confined in the county jail as the result of an OWI-related violation, the Department of Transportation (DOT) may not reinstate the violator's operating privilege until the county notifies DOT that the person has reimbursed the county or that the county is no longer seeking reimbursement from the person.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. 3 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 7, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Apr 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Mar 19, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Safety.

  6. Mar 19, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Bies, Mursau, A. Ott and Zepnick

  2. Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety

  3. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate