Assembly Bill 161
Reimbursement for damages caused by dogs and the use of funds derived from the licensing of dogs
Topics: Cats, County: Finance, Damage (to property), Dogs, Fur farm, Livestock and meat
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 19, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the owner of a farm animal, dog, or cat that was injured or killed by another person's dog may, within three days of becoming aware of the incident, file a claim with the city, village, or town in which the incident occurred.
The city, village, or town is required to investigate the claim and provide a report on the investigation to the county clerk. The county clerk submits the claim and the report to the county board and the county board decides whether to make a payment to the owner as compensation for the injury or death of the animal. If there is no money in the dog license fund, described below, the county is not required to make any payment. If the county makes a payment, it may sue the owner of the dog for the amount of damages that the dog caused.
Read the full summary Show less
Under this bill the owner of a farm animal, dog, or cat that was injured or killed by another person's dog may make a claim for the damage if the owner files the claim within five business days, rather than three days, of becoming aware of the incident.
Current law requires a person who owns a dog to have the dog licensed. The statutes establish a minimum fee for a dog license but authorize higher fees to be charged by municipalities and counties. The dog license fees are collected by municipalities. A municipality keeps any amount of the fee that it imposes above the minimum and pays the rest to the county. The law requires the county to pay 5 percent of the minimum dog license fee to the state and to keep the remainder of the fee in a separate dog license fund. The county may use the dog license fund for administering the dog license law and for the expenses of a pound for dogs run by the county or a humane society. The law also authorizes a county to use any remaining money in the dog license fund to pay claims for damages caused by dogs to farm animals, dogs, or cats.
This bill requires a county to place into a separate dog damage reimbursement fund 25 percent of the dog license fees that remain after making the required 5 percent payment to the state. This fund may be used only to pay claims by persons whose farm animals, dogs, or cats are injured by dogs, except that on March 1 any funds from fees paid for dog licenses for the previous year that have not been used to pay dog damage claims may be returned to the dog license fund and used for the purposes allowed under current law.
Who's behind it
8 representatives are its . 7 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Murtha · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 4 · Oct 27, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 7, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Oct 27, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 27, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 4.
-
Sep 24, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 19, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.
-
Mar 19, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Pasch, Lothian, Mursau, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Murtha and Nerison;Cosponsored by Senators Schultz and Olsen
- Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture
- Sep 24, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 7, Noes 4
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote