Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 165

Expanding the types of property that may be specially assessed by a neighborhood improvement district

Topics: Milwaukee: City, Municipality, Organization, Miscellaneous, Property tax: Assessment

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 9, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 24, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 53 to 45

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 26, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 147

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 11, 2010: “Published 3-23-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a municipality (any city, village, or town) may create a neighborhood improvement district (NID), upon being petitioned to do so by an owner of real property that is located in the proposed NID, if a number of steps are taken. In general, a NID is an area within a municipality consisting of parcels that are nearby to one another, but not necessarily contiguous, at least some of which are used for residential purposes and are subject to general real estate taxes, and also may include property that is acquired and owned by the NID board. If a NID is created under an approved operating plan, the municipality may impose special assessments on real property located within the NID to provide for the development, redevelopment, maintenance, operation, and promotion of the NID, except that special assessments may not be imposed on any parcel of real property that is used exclusively for less than eight residential dwelling units and real property that is exempted from general property taxes.

Under this bill, the limitation on the type of property upon which a special assessment may be imposed applies only to real property that is exempted from general property taxes.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its ⁠. All 7 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 2 · May 8, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 45 · May 13, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Dec 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 11, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 9, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 147.

  3. Mar 8, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 28, 2010

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Jan 28, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Jan 26, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  7. Jan 26, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  8. Jan 26, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 1-26-2010” (the official wording)

  9. Dec 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  10. Sep 2, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. May 18, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  12. May 13, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  13. May 13, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 45.

  14. May 8, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  15. May 8, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 2.

  16. Apr 9, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 7, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  18. Mar 24, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  19. Mar 24, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Richards, Zepnick, Colon, Grigsby, Berceau, Turner and Fields;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Carpenter and Taylor

  2. Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  7. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Rules

  9. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 45

  13. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. May 18, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  16. Sep 2, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Dec 15, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Jan 25, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-26-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  21. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 1-26-2010

  22. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Grothman and Plale

  24. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  25. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  27. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  28. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  30. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Senate amendment 1 concurred in

  31. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  32. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. Mar 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-8-2010

  34. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-9-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 147

  35. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 3-23-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote