Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
preparation and legislative consideration of a biennial budget bill; making executive sessions of the Joint Committee on Finance relating to the biennial budget bill available in real time for viewing by the public on the legislature's Internet Web site; and reporting of certain information by lobbying principals.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes all of the following changes relating to consideration of biennial
budget bills:
State agency budget requests
Currently, state agencies in every even-numbered year must submit certain
program and financial information to the Department of Administration and the
Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) that is used by the governor in preparing the
executive budget bill. Among the required information that state agencies must
submit is proposed legislation to implement programmatic and financial plans.
This bill prohibits state agencies from submitting a proposal for an earmark or
a nonfiscal policy item. Under the bill, an "earmark" includes a provision that
authorizes or requires the payment of state moneys to a specific beneficiary or
beneficiaries in a manner not determined by laws of general applicability for the
selection of the beneficiary or beneficiaries. Similarly, a nonfiscal policy item is a
provision that does not appropriate money, provide for revenue, or relate to taxation.
Biennial state agency budget modification report
Currently, the secretary of administration must prepare a biennial budget
report for distribution to the legislature on the same day that the governor delivers
his budget message to the legislature. The report contains a variety of information
relating to the state's finances, expenditures, and revenues. This bill requires the
secretary of administration to also prepare a biennial state agency budget
modification report that includes the following information: a statement identifying
each proposal in the executive budget bill that was requested by a state agency, but
that was altered by the governor; a statement identifying each proposal in the
executive budget bill that was not requested by a state agency; and a statement
specifying the costs of each of these two proposals, the policy reasons for including
each proposal in the executive budget bill, and the intended beneficiary or
beneficiaries of each proposal.
Earmark transparency report
The bill requires LFB to prepare an earmark transparency report on each
biennial budget bill and on each amendment thereto. The report must contain all
of the following: a list of all earmarks and nonfiscal policy items; the cost of each
earmark and nonfiscal policy item; and the beneficiary of each earmark and nonfiscal
policy item. If the beneficiary is an individual, LFB must identify the assembly and
senate district in which the beneficiary resides. If the beneficiary is an entity, LFB
must identify the assembly and senate district in which the beneficiary is located,
incorporated, or organized. With respect to an amendment to a biennial budget bill,
LFB must identify the representative to the assembly or senator who proposed the
earmark or nonfiscal policy item.
Joint Committee on Finance consideration of biennial budget bill
The bill provides that the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) may not vote to
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Davis (R) , Gundrum (R) , J. Ott (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kramer (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Lothian (R) , Montgomery (R) , Murtha (R) , Nass (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Roth (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Strachota (R) , Suder (R) , Townsend (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Vukmir (R) , Ziegelbauer (I) , Zipperer (R)
Full history
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Zipperer, Vukmir, Kramer, Davis, Gundrum, Kerkman, Kestell, Kleefisch, Knodl, LeMahieu, Lothian, Montgomery, Murtha, Nass, Nygren, J. Ott, Petersen, Roth, Spanbauer, Strachota, Suder, Townsend, Van Roy, Vos and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Kanavas, Cowles, Darling, Hopper, Lazich and Schultz
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1