Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
requiring ignition interlock devices for certain motor vehicle violations, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a person is convicted of a second offense relating to
operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration (in most cases, a
concentration of 0.8 or higher) or under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI-related
offense), a judge may immobilize the person's motor vehicles or require that the
person's operating privilege be limited to operating vehicles that are equipped with
an ignition interlock device. If a person is convicted of a third or subsequent
OWI-related offense within five years, a judge must limit the person's operating
privilege to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device
unless the judge orders that the person's motor vehicles be immobilized or seized and
sold at auction.
Current law requires the person to pay for the costs of installing and monitoring
the ignition interlock device on every motor vehicle he or she owns. If the judge
determines that this would work a hardship to the person, current law allows the
judge to require an ignition interlock device on some, but not all, of the person's motor
vehicles.
Under current law, no one may remove, disconnect, tamper with, or otherwise
circumvent the operation of an ignition interlock device. A person who does so may
be required to forfeit not less than $150 nor more than $600 for the first offense and,
for a second or subsequent offense within five years, may be fined not less than $300
nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.
This bill eliminates the option of ordering the person's vehicle to be immobilized
or seized and sold at auction. The bill makes it mandatory for a judge to require that
the person's operating privilege be limited, for a minimum of one year, to operating
vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device if either of the following
are true: 1) the person commits a first OWI-related offense with an alcohol
concentration of 0.15 or more; or 2) the person commits a second OWI-related
offense.
Under the bill, the judge must order that every motor vehicle the person owns
be equipped with an ignition interlock device. If the judge determines that the
person's income is at or below 150 percent of the federal poverty level, the person is
required to pay a $50 surcharge upon the installation of the first ignition interlock
device and, for each ignition interlock device, half of the installation cost, and $1 per
day toward the cost of monitoring the ignition interlock device. A person whose
income is above 150 percent of the federal poverty level is required to pay the
surcharge and assume the full cost of installing and monitoring each ignition
interlock device. Under the bill, if a person who is ordered to do so fails to pay the
surcharge or fails to have an ignition interlock device installed, he or she may not
obtain an occupational license.
Under the bill, a court may order a person who removes, disconnects, tampers
with, or otherwise circumvents the operation of an ignition interlock device to be
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 May 21, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 3, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Kaufert, Smith, Jorgensen, Sherman, Ziegelbauer, Davis, Hebl, Berceau, A. Ott, Cullen, Townsend, Roth, Spanbauer, Richards, Shilling, Soletski, Barca, Gunderson and Turner;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Leibham, Lehman, Carpenter, Darling, Harsdorf, A. Lasee and Schultz
- Feb 3, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety
- Mar 3, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 11, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 15, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas
- May 18, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas
- May 19, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1