Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 173

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the method by which the Department of Revenue makes certain calculations regarding tax incremental financing district number 4 in the village of Elmwood.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are

required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within

specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission

of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the

common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council

or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works, such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or

village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of

taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not

exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village

(the "12-percent test"), subject to one exception.

Notwithstanding the 12-percent test, this bill specifies, with regard to TID

number 4, which the village of Elmwood created, or attempted to create on January

1, 2006, based on action taken by the village board on May 8, 2006, that DOR must

proceed as if the TID was created on January 1, 2006, except that DOR may not

certify a value increment before 2009.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Murtha (R)

1 cosponsors

Harsdorf (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jun 16, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Murtha;Cosponsored by Senator Harsdorf

  2. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Nov 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Murtha

  9. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  10. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  15. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Nov 6, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  18. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  19. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  20. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  21. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  22. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  23. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-2-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  24. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to committee on Senate Organization

  26. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1