Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the method by which the Department of Revenue makes certain calculations regarding tax incremental financing district number 4 in the village of Elmwood.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may
create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development
if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of
rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use
development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are
required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within
specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission
of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the
common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council
or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of
Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base" value of the TID, which is the
equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If
the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the
base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the
value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax
increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project
costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city
or village, include public works, such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;
financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR
authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,
20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID
and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID
and the allocation period may be extended.
Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or
village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of
taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not
exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village
(the "12-percent test"), subject to one exception.
Notwithstanding the 12-percent test, this bill specifies, with regard to TID
number 4, which the village of Elmwood created, or attempted to create on January
1, 2006, based on action taken by the village board on May 8, 2006, that DOR must
proceed as if the TID was created on January 1, 2006, except that DOR may not
certify a value increment before 2009.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Jun 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Murtha;Cosponsored by Senator Harsdorf
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 10, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 4, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Murtha
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 6, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 9, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Feb 25, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-2-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1