Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 174

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

authorizing sharing of tax increments by certain environmental remediation tax incremental districts.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing

program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the

costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on

the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very

similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental

financing program.

Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution

creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with

particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made

up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board

approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to

remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to the

Department of Revenue (DOR) to certify the environmental remediation tax

incremental base of the parcel. DOR is required to certify the environmental

remediation tax incremental base if the political subdivision submits to DOR all of

the following: 1) a statement that the political subdivision has incurred some eligible

costs, together with a detailed proposed remedial action plan approved by the

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that contains cost estimates for anticipated

eligible costs, a schedule for the design and implementation that is needed to

complete the remediation, and certification from DNR that it has approved the site

investigation report that relates to the parcel; 2) a statement that all taxing

jurisdictions with authority to levy general property taxes on the parcel of property

have been notified that the political subdivision intends to recover its environmental

remediation costs by using an environmental remediation tax increment; and 3) a

statement that the political subdivision has attempted to recover its environmental

remediation costs from the person who is responsible for the environmental pollution

that is being remediated. Thereafter, the political subdivision that created the

ERTID may use positive environmental remediation tax increments to pay eligible

costs of remediating environmental pollution in the ERTID.

Currently, the maximum life of an ERTID is 23 years and no expenditure for

an eligible cost may be made by a political subdivision later than 15 years after the

environmental remediation tax incremental base is certified by DOR. An ERTID

may also terminate when a political subdivision has received sufficient

environmental remediation tax increments to cover all of the eligible costs.

This bill allows the governing body of a political subdivision to adopt a

resolution requesting that DOR allocate environmental remediation tax increments

from an ERTID that has recovered all eligible costs to another ERTID created by the

same governing body. Upon receipt of a copy of this resolution, DOR would continue

to allocate environmental remediation tax increments from the donor ERTID after

all of the eligible costs for that ERTID have been recovered. These increments would

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Richards (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)

2 cosponsors

Plale (D) , Sinicki (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

Passed 7–1 May 8, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0

Passed 94–0 Oct 29, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0

Passed 6–0 Nov 4, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

Passed 32–0 Nov 5, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Turner, Richards, Zepnick, Molepske Jr. and Barca;Cosponsored by Senator Plale

  2. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  8. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  10. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Sinicki added as a coauthor

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  15. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 10-29-2009

  18. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  19. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  21. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  23. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  24. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  29. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  31. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  32. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009

  33. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 66

  34. Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Published 11-25-2009