Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
authorizing sharing of tax increments by certain environmental remediation tax incremental districts.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing
program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the
costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on
the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very
similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental
financing program.
Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution
creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with
particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made
up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board
approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to
remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to the
Department of Revenue (DOR) to certify the environmental remediation tax
incremental base of the parcel. DOR is required to certify the environmental
remediation tax incremental base if the political subdivision submits to DOR all of
the following: 1) a statement that the political subdivision has incurred some eligible
costs, together with a detailed proposed remedial action plan approved by the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that contains cost estimates for anticipated
eligible costs, a schedule for the design and implementation that is needed to
complete the remediation, and certification from DNR that it has approved the site
investigation report that relates to the parcel; 2) a statement that all taxing
jurisdictions with authority to levy general property taxes on the parcel of property
have been notified that the political subdivision intends to recover its environmental
remediation costs by using an environmental remediation tax increment; and 3) a
statement that the political subdivision has attempted to recover its environmental
remediation costs from the person who is responsible for the environmental pollution
that is being remediated. Thereafter, the political subdivision that created the
ERTID may use positive environmental remediation tax increments to pay eligible
costs of remediating environmental pollution in the ERTID.
Currently, the maximum life of an ERTID is 23 years and no expenditure for
an eligible cost may be made by a political subdivision later than 15 years after the
environmental remediation tax incremental base is certified by DOR. An ERTID
may also terminate when a political subdivision has received sufficient
environmental remediation tax increments to cover all of the eligible costs.
This bill allows the governing body of a political subdivision to adopt a
resolution requesting that DOR allocate environmental remediation tax increments
from an ERTID that has recovered all eligible costs to another ERTID created by the
same governing body. Upon receipt of a copy of this resolution, DOR would continue
to allocate environmental remediation tax increments from the donor ERTID after
all of the eligible costs for that ERTID have been recovered. These increments would
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1
Passed 7–1 May 8, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0
Passed 94–0 Oct 29, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0
Passed 6–0 Nov 4, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Nov 5, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mason, Turner, Richards, Zepnick, Molepske Jr. and Barca;Cosponsored by Senator Plale
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Sinicki added as a coauthor
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 10-29-2009
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009
- Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 66
- Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly
Published 11-25-2009