Assembly Bill 174
Authorizing sharing of tax increments by certain environmental remediation tax incremental districts
Topics: Municipality, Property tax, Revenue, Department of
Became law
The governor signed it on Nov 12, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 30, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 94 to 0
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 32 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 66
Latest entry in the official record, Nov 18, 2009: “Published 11-25-2009”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the environmental remediation tax incremental financing program permits a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) to recoup the costs of remediating contaminated property from property taxes that are levied on the remediated property. The mechanism for financing remediation costs is very similar to the mechanism for financing project costs under the tax incremental financing program.
Initially, the governing body of a political subdivision adopts a resolution creating an environmental remediation tax incremental district (ERTID) with particular boundaries. This resolution is then reviewed by a joint review board made up of representatives of the overlying taxing jurisdictions. If the joint review board approves the ERTID, a political subdivision that has incurred eligible costs to remediate environmental pollution on a parcel of property may apply to the Department of Revenue (DOR) to certify the environmental remediation tax incremental base of the parcel. DOR is required to certify the environmental remediation tax incremental base if the political subdivision submits to DOR all of the following: 1) a statement that the political subdivision has incurred some eligible costs, together with a detailed proposed remedial action plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that contains cost estimates for anticipated eligible costs, a schedule for the design and implementation that is needed to complete the remediation, and certification from DNR that it has approved the site investigation report that relates to the parcel; 2) a statement that all taxing jurisdictions with authority to levy general property taxes on the parcel of property have been notified that the political subdivision intends to recover its environmental remediation costs by using an environmental remediation tax increment; and 3) a statement that the political subdivision has attempted to recover its environmental remediation costs from the person who is responsible for the environmental pollution that is being remediated. Thereafter, the political subdivision that created the ERTID may use positive environmental remediation tax increments to pay eligible costs of remediating environmental pollution in the ERTID.
Read the full summary Show less
Currently, the maximum life of an ERTID is 23 years and no expenditure for an eligible cost may be made by a political subdivision later than 15 years after the environmental remediation tax incremental base is certified by DOR. An ERTID may also terminate when a political subdivision has received sufficient environmental remediation tax increments to cover all of the eligible costs.
This bill allows the governing body of a political subdivision to adopt a resolution requesting that DOR allocate environmental remediation tax increments from an ERTID that has recovered all eligible costs to another ERTID created by the same governing body. Upon receipt of a copy of this resolution, DOR would continue to allocate environmental remediation tax increments from the donor ERTID after all of the eligible costs for that ERTID have been recovered. These increments would be applied to another ERTID created in the same political subdivision. Increments from the donor ERTID continue to be generated until the earlier of: 1) 23 years after the creation of the donor ERTID; or 2) the recovery of all eligible costs for the recipient ERTID.
Who's behind it
6 representatives are its . All 6 are Democrats.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 1 · May 8, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 94 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 6 to 0 · Nov 4, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 32 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Nov 18, 2009
The new law was published.
-
Nov 12, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 66.
-
Nov 10, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Senate passed it too, 32 to 0.
-
Nov 4, 2009
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)
-
Nov 4, 2009
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Nov 4, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.
-
Nov 3, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The Assembly passed it, 94 to 0.
-
Oct 29, 2009
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 29, 2009
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 10-29-2009” (the official wording)
-
May 8, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 8, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 1.
-
Apr 13, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 7, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 6, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 30, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.
-
Mar 30, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mason, Turner, Richards, Zepnick, Molepske Jr. and Barca;Cosponsored by Senator Plale
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 10-29-2009
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Sinicki added as a coauthor
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 94, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Nov 4, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009
- Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 66
- Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly
Published 11-25-2009
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote