Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 175

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

expanding the life of a tax incremental district in the city of Racine.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are

required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within

specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission

of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the

common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council

or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base value" of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended. Also under current law, a city or village

may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before

the unextended termination date of the TID.

Under this bill, for TID Number 2 in the city of Racine, the 27-year life of the

TID and the period of time during which DOR may authorize tax increments is

extended from 2010 to 2020, and the expenditure period is extended from 2005 to

2015.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Mason (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)

4 cosponsors

Coggs (D) , Lehman (D) , Plale (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

Passed 7–1 Oct 27, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Turner, Zepnick and Barca;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Plale, Coggs and Wirch

  2. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Mason

  5. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  8. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 10-29-2009

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Gottlieb, Vos and LeMahieu

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  14. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1