Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 177

Operating a motor vehicle while suspended, revoked, or disqualified

Topics: Court, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Feb 5, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 30, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 64 to 32

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Jan 19, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 102

Latest entry in the official record, Feb 9, 2010: “Published 2-18-2010.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on the highway during any period in which the person's motor vehicle operating privilege is suspended (OWS) or revoked (OAR) or the person is disqualified from operating a commercial motor vehicle (OWD). A court may suspend a person's operating privilege for any period not exceeding six months upon the person's conviction for OAR, OWS, or OWD. However, a court must revoke a person's operating privilege, for a period of six months or less, upon the person's conviction for OAR, OWS, or OWD if the person has been convicted of three or more prior violations of OAR, OWS, or OWD within the preceding five-year period. In addition, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must administratively revoke a person's operating privilege, for a period of six months unless the court has ordered a revocation for a lesser period, upon receiving a record of conviction showing that the person has been convicted of OAR, OWS, or OWD if the person has been convicted of three or more prior violations of OAR, OWS, or OWD within the preceding five-year period.

This bill makes court-ordered operating privilege revocation for a fourth offense OAR, OWS, or OWD permissive rather than mandatory and eliminates the requirement that DOT administratively revoke a person's operating privilege for a fourth offense OAR, OWS, or OWD.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. 10 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 0 · May 19, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 64 to 32 · Jun 23, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 64, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 3 · Jul 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Feb 9, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Feb 5, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 102.

  3. Feb 3, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Jul 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.

  6. Jun 25, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  7. Jun 23, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  8. Jun 23, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 64 to 32.

  9. May 19, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. May 19, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  11. Apr 17, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Apr 9, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Apr 9, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Apr 7, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Apr 6, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Apr 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Mar 30, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  18. Mar 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Grigsby, Kessler, Fields, Berceau, Smith, Young, Sinicki, Mason, A. Ott, A. Williams and Toles;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Lehman and Plale

  2. Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Honadel added as a coauthor

  9. May 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  11. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-23-2009 by committee on Rules

  13. Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 64, Noes 32

  17. Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Jun 23, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Jun 25, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  20. Jul 16, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  21. Jul 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  22. Jul 17, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  24. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  27. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 2-2-2010

  32. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 2-4-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 102

  33. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 2-18-2010.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote