Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
motor vehicle operating privileges, seizures by courts or law enforcement officers of operator's licenses, and reinstatement of canceled identification cards.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a court suspends or revokes a person's operating privilege,
the court must take possession of the person's operator's license and forward it to the
Department of Transportation (DOT). If a person is arrested for operating a motor
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), a law enforcement officer
requests the person to take a test to determine the amount of alcohol in his or her
blood or breath, and the person either refuses to take the test or the test results
indicate a prohibited alcohol concentration, the officer must take possession of the
person's operator's license and forward it to DOT.
Under this bill, a court that suspends or revokes a person's operating privilege
may take possession of a person's operator's license but is not required to do so. If
a court does take possession of a person's operator's license, the court must destroy
the license. Upon reinstatement of the person's operating privilege, instead of
returning the license, DOT must issue a new license. Also, a law enforcement officer
who arrests a person for OWI may not take possession of a person's operator's license.
The bill also allows a person who is otherwise eligible to obtain an occupational
license to do so without surrendering his or her revoked operator's license.
Under current law, if a court suspends a person's operating privilege for certain
violations and at the time of the suspension the person does not have a valid
operator's license, the period of operating privilege suspension does not begin until
the person is eligible and applies for an operator's license or until a specified period
of time elapses, whichever occurs first.
Under this bill, a person need not apply for issuance, renewal, or reinstatement
of an operator's license to trigger the commencement of the period of operating
privilege suspension. The period of operating privilege suspension begins when the
person first becomes eligible for issuance, renewal, or reinstatement of an operator's
license. This bill also eliminates the requirement that a nonresident whose
operating privilege is revoked in this state obtain a valid operator's license issued by
his or her resident state as a condition of reinstatement by DOT of the nonresident's
operating privilege.
Current law provides in most cases for automatic reinstatement of a person's
suspended operating privilege after the period of operating privilege suspension has
terminated and the person has paid the reinstatement fee. However, after revocation
of a person's operating privilege, disqualification of a person's authorization to
operate a commercial motor vehicle, or cancellation of a person's operator's license,
in most cases reinstatement requires DOT to issue a new operator's license.
Reinstated licenses expire two years from the person's next birthday.
This bill provides for automatic reinstatement of a person's revoked operating
privilege if the applicable period of revocation has expired and the person has applied
for reinstatement and paid to DOT the applicable fee. The bill also provides for
automatic reinstatement of a person's canceled operator's license or identification
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0
Passed 12–0 May 19, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 34
Passed 62–34 Jun 23, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
Passed 6–1 Jul 17, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
Passed 12–4 Oct 29, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 14
Passed 19–14 Jan 19, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Grigsby, Kessler, Fields, Young, Roys, A. Williams, Vruwink, Turner, Berceau, A. Ott, Sinicki, Colon, Honadel, Toles and Mason;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Lehman, Erpenbach, Grothman and Plale
- Mar 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Apr 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 9, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 10, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Honadel withdrawn as a coauthor
- May 7, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 19, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- May 19, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 18, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-23-2009 by committee on Rules
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 34
- Jun 23, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 23, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 25, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Jul 16, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jul 17, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1
- Jul 17, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Sep 8, 2009 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Oct 28, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 14
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 2-2-2010
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 2-4-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 103
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Published 2-18-2010.