Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 180

Changes to and extension of the Environmental Results Program, extension of the Environmental Improvement Program and the length of a compliance schedule under that program, and reporting requirements for certain environmental programs

Topics: Environmental protection, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, Sunset

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 2, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Environmental Results Program Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers the Environmental Results Program (ERP, also called Green Tier) under which qualified participants agree to improve their environmental performance and implement environmental management systems in return for incentives provided by DNR. There are two tiers of participation in ERP. A participant in tier II enters into a participation contract with DNR that sets forth the commitments of the participant and the incentives that DNR will provide. This bill makes various changes in ERP.

Under current law, DNR may not approve any application for participation in ERP after July 1, 2009. This bill eliminates that restriction.

Read the full summary

Under current law, certain environmental enforcement actions taken against an entity disqualify the entity from acceptance into ERP for a specified period. The act that created ERP, in 2004, gave the secretary of natural resources temporary authority to waive the provisions concerning an entity's environmental enforcement record if the secretary determined that the waiver was consistent with the purposes of ERP and that the waiver would not erode public confidence in the integrity of ERP.

The waiver authority expired at the end of 2006. This bill allows the secretary of natural resources to waive the provisions concerning an entity's environmental enforcement record based on the same criteria as under former law. The bill does not contain a termination date for the waiver authority.

Current law requires participants in ERP to conduct annual audits of their environmental management systems and, for participants in tier II, annual audits of their compliance with environmental laws and to report the results of those audits to DNR. Under the law, if an audit reveals a violation of an environmental law, the participant must provide information about the violation to DNR. If a participant complies with these requirements and corrects the violation within a specified period, the participant is generally exempt from paying a forfeiture (civil monetary penalty) for the violation.

This bill authorizes a participant in ERP to report to DNR a violation of an environmental law that it discovers, other than through an annual audit. If the participant reports within 30 days of discovering the violation, provides required information about the violation, and corrects the violation within a specified period, the participant is generally exempt from paying a forfeiture (civil monetary penalty) for the violation.

Currently under ERP, a participant is required to correct a violation within 90 days unless DNR approves a longer compliance schedule. The law prohibits DNR from approving a compliance schedule that is more than 12 months long. This bill authorizes DNR to approve a longer compliance schedule if the secretary of natural resources determines that a longer schedule is necessary.

Currently, DNR administers the Environmental Cooperation Pilot Program under which DNR was authorized, before October 1, 2002, to enter into not more than ten cooperative agreements with persons subject to environmental laws. The term of an agreement is five years with the possibility of one renewal for five years. In a cooperative agreement, a participant in the program is required to implement an environmental management system and to improve its environmental performance.

In return, DNR may grant operational flexibility and, under specified circumstances, provide variances from requirements under environmental laws.

This bill provides a process under which a participant in the Environmental Cooperation Pilot Program may become a participant in tier II of ERP, using the cooperative agreement under the pilot program as a basis for a participation contract under ERP.

Currently, under ERP, DNR may issue an environmental results charter to an association of entities to assist the entities to participate in tier I or tier II and to achieve improvements in the quality of the air, water, or other natural resources beyond that achieved through compliance with environmental laws (superior environmental performance). Under this bill, DNR may issue a charter to an association of entities to assist the entities to participate in tier I or tier II or to take actions that may lead to superior environmental performance.

The bill makes some changes in the required characteristics of an environmental management system and gives an applicant for tier I of ERP one year from the date that DNR approves its application, rather than one year from the date of application, to implement an environmental management system that complies with the law's requirements. The bill also changes the name of ERP to the Green Tier Program.

Environmental Improvement Program The Environmental Improvement Program (EIP), administered by DNR, limits to $500 the amount of a forfeiture (civil monetary penalty) that a qualifying entity can be required to pay because of a violation of an environmental law if the entity discovers the violation through an environmental compliance audit, reports the violation to DNR, and corrects the violation within a specified time. Current law sunsets the EIP on July 1, 2009.

This bill eliminates the sunset of EIP.

Currently, an entity does not qualify for EIP if within two years before it submits the environmental compliance audit the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed suit against the entity to enforce an environmental requirement or DNR or a local government issued a citation to the entity to enforce an environmental requirement.

This bill eliminates the automatic disqualification provision. Instead, under the bill, DNR must consider whether DOJ filed a suit against an entity to enforce an environmental requirement within two years before the entity notifies DNR that it will conduct an environmental compliance audit. If DNR determines that, because of the nature of the violation involved in a suit, the entity's participation would damage the integrity of EIP, DNR must notify the entity that it is not eligible for participation.

Currently under EIP, a qualifying entity is required to correct a violation within 90 days unless DNR approves a longer compliance schedule. The law prohibits DNR from approving a compliance schedule that is more than 12 months long. This bill authorizes DNR to approve a longer compliance schedule if the secretary of natural resources determines that a longer schedule is necessary. The bill also changes the name of EIP to the Environmental Compliance Audit Program.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (13)

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 6, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Apr 2, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  4. Apr 2, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Clark, Tauchen, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Hebl, Jorgensen, Lothian, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Ripp, Roys, Sinicki, Smith and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators Miller, Kedzie, Cowles, Erpenbach, Harsdorf, Holperin, Lassa, Lehman, Olsen, Plale, Risser, Schultz and Taylor

  2. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. May 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor