Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 183

The immobilization or removal, impoundment, and disposal of motor vehicles for multiple nonmoving traffic violations

Topics: County: Ordinance, Forfeiture, Motor vehicle: Parking, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Municipality: Ordinance

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 2, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, an authority that issues citations (tickets) for nonmoving traffic (parking) violations may enforce parking violations in several ways. A person issued a parking ticket may pay the ticket by mail as the parking ticket provides and, if the person does so, the parking ticket is not filed with or transmitted to court. The person may also appear in court to contest the parking ticket. If the person does not pay the parking ticket or make a timely appearance in court, the authority that issued the ticket may issue a summons to the person and follow a procedure to request that the Department of Transportation (DOT) suspend the person's vehicle registration or, in lieu of this procedure, follow a procedure for the issuance of a warrant for the person and for the person's arrest or deposit of money or a driver's license to secure the person's appearance in court.

Also under current law, any city, village, or town (municipality) or any county may enact an ordinance prohibiting unregistered motor vehicles on highways and providing for the immobilization, removal (towing), impoundment, and disposal of these vehicles.

Read the full summary

This bill creates an alternative method for the enforcement of multiple parking violations. The bill allows a municipality or county to enact an ordinance providing for the immobilization with an immobilization device (typically a "car boot") or towing, impoundment, and disposal of vehicles owned by habitual parking violators.

The ordinance must be limited to those vehicles for which all of the following apply:

1. The municipality or county has issued tickets to the owner of the motor vehicle for three or more parking violations that, at the time of the vehicle's immobilization or towing, occurred more than 28 days previously and for which the owner has neither paid each ticket nor scheduled an appearance in court in response to each unpaid ticket.

2. The municipality or county has mailed to the last-known address of the owner at least one notice that provides, for each parking ticket, certain information, including the manner in which each parking ticket may be paid or contested. The notice must also inform the owner that the owner's vehicles may be immobilized or towed and impounded if, within 28 days after the owner has received three or more citations and at the time the vehicle is immobilized or towed, the owner has not either paid the ticket for each violation that occurred more than 28 days previously or scheduled an appearance in court in response to each unpaid ticket issued more than 28 days previously. The notice may be combined with any other notice provided by the municipality or county to the vehicle owner.

The ordinance authorizes any parking enforcer to have a vehicle to which the ordinance applies immobilized on, or towed and impounded from, or both, any portion of a street, highway, or publicly owned or leased parking facility, regardless of whether the vehicle is legally or illegally parked. Upon immobilization or towing of the vehicle, the parking enforcer must follow certain procedures for notification of law enforcement and the vehicle owner, which are the same procedures applicable to immobilization or towing of an unregistered vehicle. The ordinance must require that, if the vehicle is immobilized, the parking enforcer, or a third-party contractor performing immobilization services, place in a highly visible location on the vehicle a written notice that warns the driver that the immobilization device has been placed on the vehicle, that either provides specified information related to the applicable unpaid parking tickets or provides a telephone number through which this information is available 24 hours a day, and that states the amount of any fee for removal of the immobilization device. The bill includes restrictions on the issuance of parking tickets for the vehicle after it is immobilized if it is immobilized in a time-limited, legal parking space.

Under the bill, the owner of a motor vehicle that is immobilized or towed and impounded may secure release of the motor vehicle by paying any fee for the removal of the immobilization device or any charges associated with the towing and impounding of the vehicle, respectively, and paying all forfeitures for the unpaid parking tickets outstanding more than 28 days or scheduling an appearance in court in response to these unpaid parking tickets, or a combination of making the payments or scheduling the appearances. The bill also provides a procedure guiding the impoundment and, if the requirements for release of the vehicle are not timely satisfied, disposal of vehicles that are towed and impounded, which procedures are the same as those applicable to the towing and impoundment of unregistered vehicles. Any motor vehicle immobilized or impounded must remain immobilized or impounded until lawfully claimed or disposed of. The owner of any motor vehicle immobilized or towed and impounded is responsible for all charges associated with immobilizing, removing, impounding, and disposing of the motor vehicle. Charges not recovered from the sale of the motor vehicle may be recovered in a civil action by the municipality or county against the owner.

Who's behind it

10 representatives are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 1 · Jun 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Jun 16, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  4. May 5, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Apr 20, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Apr 2, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  7. Apr 2, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Krusick, Gottlieb, Richards, Staskunas, Zepnick, Mursau, A. Ott, Stone, Townsend and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Carpenter and Darling

  2. Apr 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. May 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Krusick

  6. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  8. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote