Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 194

Administration of certain public assistance programs in Milwaukee County, removing county civil service protections from certain employees, required provisions in certain collective bargaining agreements under the Municipal Employment Relations Act, and making an appropriation

Topics: Children and Families, Department of, Civil service, Collective bargaining, Day care, Employment Relations Commission, Health Services, Department of: Supportive living and treatment, Legislature: Retirement Systems, Joint Survey Committee on, Medical assistance, Public employee, Public welfare

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 7, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

The Department of Health Services (DHS) administers income maintenance programs under current law, as well as the programs that provide state supplemental payments to persons receiving federal supplemental security income (state supplemental payment programs). The income maintenance programs are specified in the statutes as the Medical Assistance program, including BadgerCare Plus; the food stamp program; and the program that pays funeral, burial, and cemetery expenses for persons whose estates are insufficient to pay those expenses.

Generally, income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs are administered by counties through contracts with DHS.

Read the full summary

This bill requires DHS to establish a Milwaukee County enrollment services unit (unit) in DHS to determine eligibility for and administer income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs in Milwaukee County (county). In addition, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) may contract with DHS to have the unit perform eligibility and authorization functions in the county for DCF's child care subsidy program. Under the bill, DHS may contract with the county for the performance by the county of administrative functions under the income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs and, if DCF so contracts with DHS, for the performance of the eligibility and authorization functions under the child care subsidy program. The county is required to expend a certain specified amount for the operation of income maintenance programs in the county, and DHS must reimburse the county for all approved costs that exceed that amount for the operation of the income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs in the county and, if DCF so contracts with DHS, for the performance of the eligibility and authorization functions under the child care subsidy program in the county. The bill also requires DHS and Milwaukee County, at a specified time in the future, to discuss who will operate the income maintenance programs in the county and how the programs will be operated.

The bill requires that supervisory personnel in the unit be state employees and that all other employees in the unit may be a combination of state employees and county employees. Milwaukee County is required to maintain for the unit no fewer represented authorized full-time employee positions than the number of represented employee positions that were authorized on February 1, 2009, to perform the functions that the unit will perform under the bill. Under the bill, DHS has the authority to supervise, hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, discipline, and adjust grievances with respect to county employees performing services for the unit. The bill provides that any DHS employment decision affecting county employees may be appealed to the Employment Relations Commission, as are decisions affecting state employees. In addition, DHS must use the same employment process and procedures that are used for appointments to the classified service of the state civil service system, including specifically the use of probationary periods. County employees performing services for the unit are subject to the same residency requirements as are other employees of Milwaukee County under the county's civil service rules.

The bill provides certain enhanced benefits for county employees who are appointed as state employees and are employed in the unit. First, the employee must have his or her seniority with the state computed by treating the employee's total service with the county as state service. Second, the employee's annual leave and accrued sick leave must be based on both county and state years of service. Third, the employee is immediately covered for employer contributions towards health care coverage insurance when the employee becomes insured, unlike other most other state employees who must wait until the first day of the third month after beginning state employment. Finally, the employee is given the option of remaining a participant in the Milwaukee County Employees' Retirement System as opposed to becoming covered under the Wisconsin Retirement System.

Under current law, every county with a population of at least 500,000 (presently only Milwaukee County) is required to have a civil service system for county employees who are in the classified service. The civil service procedures that apply to classified employees relate to issues such as competitive examinations, hiring, disciplinary procedures, and standardized scales of compensation. County employees who are in the unclassified service are not subject to the civil service procedures, and state statutes specify which county employees are in the unclassified service. Under the bill, nonsupervisory county employees who perform staff services for the unit are placed in the unclassified service for purposes of the county civil service provisions of the statutes.

Under the bill, a collective bargaining agreement that covers county employees who perform services for the unit must contain a provision that permits the terms of the agreement to be modified, with respect to hours and conditions of employment, by a memorandum of understanding entered into with DHS.

Current law contains various provisions for the recovery of both correctly made and incorrectly made payments under programs administered by DHS, including income maintenance and state supplemental payment programs. Generally, if the efforts of an employee of a county are responsible for a recovery, the county may retain a portion of the amount recovered. The bill provides that in Milwaukee County, no portion of amounts recovered through the efforts of a state or county employee are to be retained by Milwaukee County, but such amounts will be deposited in their entirety in the general fund and credited to an appropriation that pays for, among other things, recovery effort costs and activities related to error reduction.

Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. All 5 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Apr 23, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. May 26, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Apr 23, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  5. Apr 15, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Apr 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Apr 7, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  8. Apr 7, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Grigsby, Sinicki, Pasch, Fields and Kessler;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Coggs and Plale

  2. Apr 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Apr 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-28-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Honadel

  12. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Richards, Young and Pasch

  13. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Grigsby

  14. Apr 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. May 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote