Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 209

Authorizing a county to provide assistance to a nonprofit organization that provides assistance to certain individuals

Topics: County: Finance, Organization, Miscellaneous, Poor, Women

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 12, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 14, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Sep 22, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 75

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 18, 2009: “Published 11-25-2009”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county is authorized to operate a relief program for certain individuals who reside in the county, based on eligibility criteria set by the county.

The county program may provide services, commodities, or money and may contain a work component. Current law also authorizes a county to appropriate money to provide emergency energy supplies to individuals or to provide grants to community action agencies or municipalities to assist individuals with the purchase of such supplies.

Read the full summary

This bill authorizes a county to appropriate money to a nonprofit organization that provides assistance to low-income individuals or individuals who are victims of domestic violence and related crimes, and to make payments to such an organization for its capital and operational expenses.

Who's behind it

15 lawmakers are its ⁠. 9 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 2 · Sep 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 27, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 18, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 12, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 75.

  3. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Oct 27, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Oct 21, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Sep 24, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.

  8. Sep 23, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  9. Sep 22, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Sep 22, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Sep 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Sep 16, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 2.

  13. May 5, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Apr 23, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Apr 14, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  16. Apr 14, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Seidel, Bies, Danou, Grigsby, Hraychuck, Jorgensen, Kestell, Mason, Milroy, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Petrowski, Spanbauer, Tauchen and Van Akkeren;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, Decker, Jauch, Lehman, Leibham and Taylor

  2. Apr 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Gottlieb

  6. Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  8. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  9. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  13. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Sep 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  19. Oct 21, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  20. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  21. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  22. Oct 27, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  24. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  27. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  28. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-10-2009

  32. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-12-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 75

  33. Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Published 11-25-2009

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote