Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 21

Discharge from employment of a passenger-for-hire vehicle operator solely on the basis of having been involved in a single motor vehicle accident

Topics: Discrimination in employment, Motor vehicle: Accident, Taxi, Workforce Development, Department of

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Oct 29, 2009, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 5, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 29, 2009

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the owner of a vehicle operated for the conveyance of passengers for hire is liable for all injuries and damage done by a person employed by the owner as an operator of the vehicle while operating the vehicle in the same manner as the operator would be liable.

This bill prohibits a person engaged in the business of operating a vehicle for the conveyance of passengers for hire (employer) from discharging from employment an individual who is employed by the employer to operate such a vehicle (operator) solely on the basis of the operator having been involved in a single motor vehicle accident. The bill also prohibits an employer from discharging or discriminating against an operator or other employee in promotion, in compensation, or in the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment for opposing the discharge of an operator in violation of the bill, for filing a complaint or attempting to enforce the right of an operator not to be discharged in violation of the bill, or for testifying or assisting in any action or proceeding to enforce that right.

Read the full summary

An operator or other employee who is discharged or discriminated against in violation of the bill may file a complaint with the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), and DWD must process the complaint in the same manner that employment discrimination complaints are processed under current law, which processing may include the ordering of back pay, reinstatement, costs, and attorney fees. In addition, an employer that discharges or discriminates against an operator or other employee in violation of the bill is debarred from being awarded a contract by a state agency or local governmental unit for three years after DWD or a court finds that the employer committed the violation.

Who's behind it

Marlin Schneider, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 27, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 27, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 17, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Nov 3, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development.

  4. Oct 29, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  5. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Oct 27, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Oct 27, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  9. Aug 27, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Feb 11, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Feb 5, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development.

  12. Feb 5, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Schneider

  2. Feb 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development

  3. Feb 11, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 26, 2009 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  5. Aug 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider

  6. Aug 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Schneider

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table

  15. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Mursau and Schneider

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 adopted

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families and Workforce Development

  24. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote