Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
penalty surcharges, court fees, drivers' records, and drug and alcohol assessment for persons who commit certain offenses relating to driving while intoxicated.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a person who is subject to a forfeiture or a fine for violating
most state laws or local ordinances is also liable for a variety of penalty surcharges
and court fees. In addition, a person who commits an offense relating to driving while
intoxicated is liable for a penalty surcharge for driver improvement programs and
is required to comply with an alcohol and other drug assessment before he or she is
eligible for reinstatement of his or her driving privileges.
Currently, a person who commits his or her first offense related to driving while
intoxicated and who has a blood alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.099 at the
time of the offense is not liable for the surcharges or fees and does not need to comply
with an alcohol or other drug assessment program. Further, the Department of
Transportation (DOT) must purge its records of a first offense related to driving
while intoxicated after ten years; the department keeps all other records of offenses
related to driving while intoxicated permanently.
Under this bill, a person who commits his or her first offense related to driving
while intoxicated and who has a blood alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.099
at the time of the violation is liable for the surcharges or fees and must comply with
an alcohol or other drug assessment program before his or her driving privileges may
be reinstated. Under this bill, DOT must keep a record of this offense permanently.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 May 21, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Townsend, Berceau, Montgomery, A. Ott, Richards, Smith, Mason, Honadel and Bies;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Lehman, Darling and Olsen
- Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Public Safety
- Apr 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 19, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Public Safety, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Jun 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1