Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 219

Requiring that personal flotation devices be worn by certain underage persons in certain boats

Topics: Boat, Children, Youth

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jan 26, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 17, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 26, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, each boat must have on it a personal flotation device for each person riding in or on the boat. Under this bill, a person may not operate a recreational boat that is less than 26 feet in length unless, during the time the boat is under way, every person on the boat who is 12 years old or younger is wearing a personal flotation device or is in a cabin space or below the deck.

Who's behind it

15 lawmakers are its ⁠. 12 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Tourism vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Nov 10, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 2 · Mar 11, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 5, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  3. Jan 29, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  4. Jan 26, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  5. Jan 26, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Jan 26, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Nov 10, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 2.

  9. Oct 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Apr 23, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Apr 17, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties.

  12. Apr 17, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Clark, Staskunas, Hebl, Hraychuck, Cullen, Pasch, Jorgensen, Berceau, A. Ott, Petrowski, Smith, Steinbrink, Townsend, Zepnick and Zigmunt;Cosponsored by Senators Sullivan, Cowles, Lassa, Lehman, Miller, Risser, Taylor and Wirch

  2. Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties

  3. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark

  6. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  8. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  9. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-26-2010 by committee on Rules

  11. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Clark and Staskunas

  12. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 withdrawn and returned to author

  15. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Jan 29, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  21. Mar 10, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  23. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote