Assembly Bill 228
Awarding state procurements to certified disabled veteran-owned businesses, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority
Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, Commerce, Department of, Minority enterprise, Purchasing, Government, Transportation, Department of: Administration, Veteran
Became law
The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 23, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Sep 16, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 299
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Currently, minority-owned businesses that are certified by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) receive certain preferences in governmental procurement.
State agencies must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total amount expended for state procurements in each fiscal year is paid to minority-owned businesses.
Read the full summary Show less
With the exception of nonhighway construction work and certain other limited exceptions, state agencies that are subject to requirements to make purchases through competitive bidding or competitive sealed proposals may accept a bid or proposal from a minority-owned business that is no more than 5 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal. Unless the secretary of administration reports to the Joint Committee on Finance the reasons for not doing so, the Building Commission must ensure that at least 6 percent of the total long-term state public debt, revenue bonding, and short-term borrowing in each fiscal year is underwritten by minority-owned investment firms. The Investment Board must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds it expends for financial and investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond brokerage commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of minority-owned financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms.
In addition, metropolitan sewerage commissions serving metropolitan sewerage districts that encompass first class cities, presently only Milwaukee, must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds expended for financial and investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond brokerage commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of minority-owned financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms. Current law contracting provisions that apply to special purpose districts (local exposition districts, professional baseball park districts, professional football stadium districts, and cultural arts districts) also contain provisions that relate to minority and women hiring and contracting. Generally, persons awarded contracts for local exposition districts must agree that at least 25 percent of the employees hired because of the contracts will be minority group members; at least 5 percent of the employees hired will be women; at least 25 percent of the aggregate dollar value of certain contracts will be awarded to minority businesses; and at least 5 percent of the aggregate dollar value of certain contracts will be awarded to women's business. In the case of the other special districts, the minority and women contracting provisions are goals, which generally include the same participation percentages, except that the participation percentages for minority group members is 15 percent for football stadium districts and cultural arts districts.
This bill creates similar preferences in awarding state contracts or orders to disabled veteran-owned businesses certified by Commerce. The bill does not, however, create any goals for total amounts or percentages of state contracts or orders to be awarded to these businesses. The bill defines a disabled veteran as a veteran who, at the time of application for certification, is a resident of the state and is in receipt of an award from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs of a disability rating of at least 30 percent.
Under the bill, Commerce must certify a business, financial adviser, or investment firm that meets all of the following requirements:
1. One or more disabled veterans owns not less than 51 percent of the business, financial adviser, or investment firm or, if the business, financial adviser, or investment firm is publicly owned, 51 percent of the stock.
2. One or more disabled veterans or duly authorized representatives of the disabled veteran controls the management and daily business operations of the business, financial adviser, or investment firm.
3. The business, financial adviser, or investment firm has its principal place of business in this state.
4. The business, financial adviser, or investment firm is performing a useful business function. Useful business function is defined under the bill as the provision of materials, supplies, equipment, or services to customers, including the state.
Commerce may decertify any business, financial adviser, or investment firm that Commerce determines no longer qualifies for certification. The bill establishes an appeal process for businesses, financial advisers, or investment firms decertified by Commerce.
The bill directs the Department of Administration (DOA) to annually report to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature concerning the total amount of money and the percentage of the total amount of money paid to and the percentage of the total amount of indebtedness underwritten by disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms. In addition, the bill directs DOA to report to the same committees, no later than March 31 of the fourth year beginning after the year in which the bill becomes law concerning DOA's recommendations for either a goal consisting of a percentage of the total amount of money that will be paid annually to disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms by state agencies or a goal consisting of an annual percentage increase in the total amount of money that will be paid to disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms by state agencies during at least the first full five-year period that follows the date of the report. In calculating all amounts paid to and percentages of amounts paid to businesses and firms, DOA is directed to exclude any contracts or purchases for which a purchase preference would violate a federal law or regulation or any contract between a state agency and a federal agency, or would result in a reduction in the amount of federal aids received by this state.
The Department of Transportation (DOT) administers a disadvantaged business mobilization assistance program, a loan guarantee program created to assist disadvantaged businesses in obtaining capital to participate in DOT construction contracts. Under the program, DOT may make grants to provide funding for these loan guarantees. This bill makes disabled veteran-owned businesses eligible for this program.
Who's behind it
11 lawmakers are its . 7 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans. 2 have no party on record.
6 more lawmakers .
See all 17 names Hide the names
Authors (11)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Jim Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Sherman
- Shilling
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (6)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 10 to 0 · Sep 4, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Commerce vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 23, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 13, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 299.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 23, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Jan 12, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 23, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail.
-
Sep 17, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Sep 16, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
Sep 16, 2009
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Sep 16, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Sep 4, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Sep 4, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.
-
Sep 2, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 31, 2009
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Jul 28, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 4, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 14, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 11, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 23, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs.
-
Apr 23, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sherman, Turner, Hilgenberg, J. Ott, Petrowski, Berceau, Jorgensen, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Shilling and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Lehman, Taylor and Vinehout
- Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs
- May 11, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 14, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 4, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 28, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Sherman
- Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly
Senator Jauch added as a cosponsor
- Sep 1, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Barca added as a coauthor
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 17, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Jan 12, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 21, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 299
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote