Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 228

Awarding state procurements to certified disabled veteran-owned businesses, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, Commerce, Department of, Minority enterprise, Purchasing, Government, Transportation, Department of: Administration, Veteran

Became law

The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Sep 16, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 299

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, minority-owned businesses that are certified by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) receive certain preferences in governmental procurement.

State agencies must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total amount expended for state procurements in each fiscal year is paid to minority-owned businesses.

Read the full summary

With the exception of nonhighway construction work and certain other limited exceptions, state agencies that are subject to requirements to make purchases through competitive bidding or competitive sealed proposals may accept a bid or proposal from a minority-owned business that is no more than 5 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal. Unless the secretary of administration reports to the Joint Committee on Finance the reasons for not doing so, the Building Commission must ensure that at least 6 percent of the total long-term state public debt, revenue bonding, and short-term borrowing in each fiscal year is underwritten by minority-owned investment firms. The Investment Board must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds it expends for financial and investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond brokerage commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of minority-owned financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms.

In addition, metropolitan sewerage commissions serving metropolitan sewerage districts that encompass first class cities, presently only Milwaukee, must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds expended for financial and investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond brokerage commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of minority-owned financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms. Current law contracting provisions that apply to special purpose districts (local exposition districts, professional baseball park districts, professional football stadium districts, and cultural arts districts) also contain provisions that relate to minority and women hiring and contracting. Generally, persons awarded contracts for local exposition districts must agree that at least 25 percent of the employees hired because of the contracts will be minority group members; at least 5 percent of the employees hired will be women; at least 25 percent of the aggregate dollar value of certain contracts will be awarded to minority businesses; and at least 5 percent of the aggregate dollar value of certain contracts will be awarded to women's business. In the case of the other special districts, the minority and women contracting provisions are goals, which generally include the same participation percentages, except that the participation percentages for minority group members is 15 percent for football stadium districts and cultural arts districts.

This bill creates similar preferences in awarding state contracts or orders to disabled veteran-owned businesses certified by Commerce. The bill does not, however, create any goals for total amounts or percentages of state contracts or orders to be awarded to these businesses. The bill defines a disabled veteran as a veteran who, at the time of application for certification, is a resident of the state and is in receipt of an award from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs of a disability rating of at least 30 percent.

Under the bill, Commerce must certify a business, financial adviser, or investment firm that meets all of the following requirements:

1. One or more disabled veterans owns not less than 51 percent of the business, financial adviser, or investment firm or, if the business, financial adviser, or investment firm is publicly owned, 51 percent of the stock.

2. One or more disabled veterans or duly authorized representatives of the disabled veteran controls the management and daily business operations of the business, financial adviser, or investment firm.

3. The business, financial adviser, or investment firm has its principal place of business in this state.

4. The business, financial adviser, or investment firm is performing a useful business function. Useful business function is defined under the bill as the provision of materials, supplies, equipment, or services to customers, including the state.

Commerce may decertify any business, financial adviser, or investment firm that Commerce determines no longer qualifies for certification. The bill establishes an appeal process for businesses, financial advisers, or investment firms decertified by Commerce.

The bill directs the Department of Administration (DOA) to annually report to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature concerning the total amount of money and the percentage of the total amount of money paid to and the percentage of the total amount of indebtedness underwritten by disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms. In addition, the bill directs DOA to report to the same committees, no later than March 31 of the fourth year beginning after the year in which the bill becomes law concerning DOA's recommendations for either a goal consisting of a percentage of the total amount of money that will be paid annually to disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms by state agencies or a goal consisting of an annual percentage increase in the total amount of money that will be paid to disabled veteran-owned businesses, financial advisers, and investment firms by state agencies during at least the first full five-year period that follows the date of the report. In calculating all amounts paid to and percentages of amounts paid to businesses and firms, DOA is directed to exclude any contracts or purchases for which a purchase preference would violate a federal law or regulation or any contract between a state agency and a federal agency, or would result in a reduction in the amount of federal aids received by this state.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) administers a disadvantaged business mobilization assistance program, a loan guarantee program created to assist disadvantaged businesses in obtaining capital to participate in DOT construction contracts. Under the program, DOT may make grants to provide funding for these loan guarantees. This bill makes disabled veteran-owned businesses eligible for this program.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans. 2 have no party on record.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Sep 4, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Commerce vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 23, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 13, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 299.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 23, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  6. Jan 12, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Sep 23, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail.

  8. Sep 17, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  9. Sep 16, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Sep 16, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. Sep 16, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Sep 4, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Sep 4, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  14. Sep 2, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Aug 31, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  16. Jul 28, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jun 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. May 14, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. May 11, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Apr 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs.

  21. Apr 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sherman, Turner, Hilgenberg, J. Ott, Petrowski, Berceau, Jorgensen, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Shilling and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Lehman, Taylor and Vinehout

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. May 11, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Sherman

  8. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Jauch added as a cosponsor

  9. Sep 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  12. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  13. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules

  15. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  17. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  18. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail

  24. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  26. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  27. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Apr 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. May 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  37. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 299

  38. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-26-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote