Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 228

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

awarding state procurements to certified disabled veteran-owned businesses, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Currently, minority-owned businesses that are certified by the Department of

Commerce (Commerce) receive certain preferences in governmental procurement.

State agencies must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total amount expended

for state procurements in each fiscal year is paid to minority-owned businesses.

With the exception of nonhighway construction work and certain other limited

exceptions, state agencies that are subject to requirements to make purchases

through competitive bidding or competitive sealed proposals may accept a bid or

proposal from a minority-owned business that is no more than 5 percent higher than

the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal. Unless the secretary of

administration reports to the Joint Committee on Finance the reasons for not doing

so, the Building Commission must ensure that at least 6 percent of the total

long-term state public debt, revenue bonding, and short-term borrowing in each

fiscal year is underwritten by minority-owned investment firms. The Investment

Board must attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds it expends for

financial and investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond

brokerage commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of

minority-owned financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms.

In addition, metropolitan sewerage commissions serving metropolitan

sewerage districts that encompass first class cities, presently only Milwaukee, must

attempt to ensure that 5 percent of the total funds expended for financial and

investment analysis and for common stock and convertible bond brokerage

commissions in each fiscal year is expended for the services of minority-owned

financial advisers or minority-owned investment firms. Current law contracting

provisions that apply to special purpose districts (local exposition districts,

professional baseball park districts, professional football stadium districts, and

cultural arts districts) also contain provisions that relate to minority and women

hiring and contracting. Generally, persons awarded contracts for local exposition

districts must agree that at least 25 percent of the employees hired because of the

contracts will be minority group members; at least 5 percent of the employees hired

will be women; at least 25 percent of the aggregate dollar value of certain contracts

will be awarded to minority businesses; and at least 5 percent of the aggregate dollar

value of certain contracts will be awarded to women's business. In the case of the

other special districts, the minority and women contracting provisions are goals,

which generally include the same participation percentages, except that the

participation percentages for minority group members is 15 percent for football

stadium districts and cultural arts districts.

This bill creates similar preferences in awarding state contracts or orders to

disabled veteran-owned businesses certified by Commerce. The bill does not,

however, create any goals for total amounts or percentages of state contracts or

orders to be awarded to these businesses. The bill defines a disabled veteran as a

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , J. Ott (R) , Jorgensen (D) , Petrowski (R) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Sherman , Shilling , Smith (D) , Turner (D)

6 cosponsors

Barca (D) , Jauch (D) , Kreitlow (D) , Lehman (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Sep 4, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 23, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sherman, Turner, Hilgenberg, J. Ott, Petrowski, Berceau, Jorgensen, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Shilling and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Lehman, Taylor and Vinehout

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs

  3. May 11, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Sherman

  8. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Jauch added as a cosponsor

  9. Sep 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  12. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  13. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules

  15. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  17. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  18. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Sep 17, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail

  24. Jan 12, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  26. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  27. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Apr 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. May 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  37. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 299

  38. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-26-2010