Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 230

Electronic access by law enforcement agencies to photographs on motor vehicle operators licenses and identification cards

Topics: Data processing, Identification cards, Justice, Department of, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Police, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 16, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 3, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 2, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 167

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 19, 2010: “Published 3-29-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

With limited exceptions, current law requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to take a photograph of all applicants for an operator's license or identification card. DOT may keep copies of the photographs for its own use but generally must keep the photographs confidential. However, DOT may release a photograph to the individual whose photograph was taken. In addition, DOT may release a copy of a photograph taken on or after September 1, 1997, to a Wisconsin law enforcement agency, a federal law enforcement agency, or a law enforcement agency of another state upon written request of the agency if certain conditions are satisfied. These conditions generally require that the photograph be requested for specified law enforcement purposes and that certain measures be taken to guard against further disclosure of the photograph.

Also under current law, the Department of Justice (DOJ) administers a transaction information for the management of enforcement (TIME) system that provides law enforcement agencies with access to certain information.

Read the full summary

This bill requires DOT to make available to DOJ, in a digital format, any photograph taken of an operator's license or identification card applicant that is maintained by DOT. The bill requires DOJ to provide for electronic access by Wisconsin law enforcement agencies, federal law enforcement agencies, and law enforcement agencies of other states operator's license and identification card photographs for the administration of criminal justice and for traffic enforcement.

Access to these photographs must be available electronically through the TIME system if the law enforcement agency submits an electronic request satisfying certain conditions. Provisions of current law establishing measures that must be taken to guard against further disclosure of photographs provided to law enforcement agencies also apply to photographs obtained electronically through the TIME system. DOJ and DOT must ensure that, upon submission by law enforcement agencies of electronic requests meeting the requirements under the bill, electronic access to photographs is promptly available to these requesting agencies.

Who's behind it

24 lawmakers are its ⁠. 16 are Republicans and 7 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 32 names

Authors (24)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 11 to 0 · Sep 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 91 to 2 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 91, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 19, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 16, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 167.

  3. Mar 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 2, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Mar 2, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Jan 20, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  7. Jan 14, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Nov 9, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  9. Nov 4, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  10. Nov 3, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 91 to 2.

  11. Nov 3, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Sep 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Sep 16, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.

  14. Jul 20, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jul 16, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. May 26, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  18. Apr 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Rhoades, Shilling, Montgomery, Brooks, Berceau, Van Akkeren, Danou, Gottlieb, LeMahieu, Townsend, Huebsch, Pridemore, Lothian, Gundrum, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Spanbauer, Steinbrink, Dexter, Kaufert, Murtha, Ripp and Bies;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Olsen, Harsdorf, Leibham, Schultz, Darling and A. Lasee

  2. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. May 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jul 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation

  8. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  9. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  10. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-3-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 91, Noes 2

  17. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  20. Jan 14, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  23. Jan 20, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Feb 25, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-2-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  29. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  30. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  34. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 167

  35. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 3-29-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote