Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
limiting a city's and village's use of direct annexation and authorizing limited town challenges to an annexation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Currently, town territory that is contiguous to any city or village may be
annexed to that city or village under several methods if, in general, some of the city's
or village's territory is in the same county as the territory to be annexed, unless both
the town and county boards approve of the proposed annexation, and the city or
village agrees to make limited payments to the town based on property taxes that the
town levied on the annexed territory.
Three of the methods of annexation include the following: 1) direct annexation,
under which a petition for annexation that was signed by the required number of
electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk; 2) annexation by
referendum, under which a petition for referendum that was signed by the required
number of electors and landowners is filed with the city or village clerk, and a
referendum is held and passes in the town; and 3) annexation by court order and
referendum, under which the governing body of a city or village adopts a resolution
declaring its intention to apply to the circuit court for an order for an annexation
referendum.
Another method of annexation is direct annexation by unanimous approval. If
a petition for direct annexation by unanimous approval signed by all of the electors
residing in the territory and the owners of all of the real property in the territory is
filed with the city or village clerk and the town clerk of all of the involved towns, along
with a scale map and legal description of the property to be annexed, the governing
body of the city or village may, generally, annex the property by a two-thirds vote of
the body. Such an annexation, however, is subject to Department of Administration
advisory review as if the annexation petition were for direct, but not unanimous,
annexation or annexation by referendum.
Generally, cities and villages may also annex territory that is owned by the city
or village and that lies near but not necessarily contiguous to the city or village by
enacting an ordinance to annex such territory.
This bill limits the use of direct annexation by unanimous approval to town land
that is contiguous to the annexing city or village.
Under current law, a town may not challenge in court, on any grounds, any
direct annexation by unanimous approval as well as several other types of
annexations. Under this bill, a town may challenge direct annexation by unanimous
approval, as well as several other types of annexations, including annexation by
referendum initiated by a city or village and annexation of city-owned or
village-owned territory, but only on the issue of whether the territory proposed for
annexation is contiguous to the annexing city or village.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 2
Passed 12–2 Nov 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jorgensen, Clark, Danou, Hilgenberg, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, Kerkman, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Petersen, Ripp, Roth, Townsend and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, A. Lasee and Schultz
- Apr 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs
- May 21, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 16, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Jorgensen
- Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 12, Noes 2
- Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 13, Noes 1
- Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Berceau
- Apr 12, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Jorgensen
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1