Assembly Bill 241
Retail theft, proof of ownership for flea market sales, and providing penalties
Topics: Crime and criminals, Crime and criminals: Felony, Data processing: Criminal acts and law enforcement, Sales
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Nov 3, 2009, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 30, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 3, 2009
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the penalty for retail theft is based on the value of the merchandise taken. Retail theft is a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the merchandise does not exceed $2,500, a Class I felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $2,500 but does not exceed $5,000, a Class H felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $5,000 but does not exceed $10,000, and a Class G felony if the value of the merchandise exceeds $10,000.
Also under current law a person may be convicted of engaging in organized crime, a Class E felony, if the person participates as part of an enterprise in the commission of at least three incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics. "Racketeering activity" is the attempt, conspiracy to commit, or commission of various felonies including felony retail theft.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill makes retail theft of merchandise a Class I felony, and racketeering activity, if the value of the merchandise exceeds $1,500 but does not exceed $5,000.
The bill also makes retail theft of merchandise that is valued at less than $1,500 a Class I felony, and racketeering activity, if the actor commits the theft with intent to sell the merchandise by means of the Internet. The bill further provides that evidence that a person sold merchandise that is similar to stolen merchandise, by means of the Internet and within 90 days preceding the theft, is evidence of the person's intent to sell the stolen merchandise by means of the Internet.
The bill also requires a person selling certain merchandise at a flea market or similar facility to have proof that the person owns the merchandise and to make the proof available to a law enforcement officer for inspection. The merchandise covered by the bill's requirements includes baby food, cosmetics, drugs, infant formula, and batteries. Under the bill, "proof of ownership" means all of the following: 1) the name, address, and telephone number of the supplier of the merchandise; 2) the name and address of the person that received the merchandise; and 3) a description of the merchandise. Violators are subject to a fine up to $500, up to 30 days' imprisonment, or both.
Who's behind it
17 representatives are its . 9 are Republicans and 8 are Democrats.
9 more lawmakers .
See all 26 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- John Steinbrink · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (9)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 1 · Oct 9, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 79 to 13 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 79, Noes 13”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 4, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 4, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Feb 19, 2010
“Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received” (the official wording)
-
Feb 5, 2010
“Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)
-
Feb 4, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 9, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Nov 6, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Nov 5, 2009
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
Nov 3, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Oct 9, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 9, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 1.
-
May 28, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 30, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.
-
Apr 30, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Pasch, Kestell, Van Roy, Brooks, Lothian, Kerkman, Staskunas, A. Ott, Steinbrink, Zepnick, Kleefisch, Kaufert, Bies and Hebl;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Sullivan, Kreitlow, Holperin, Lassa, Wirch, Harsdorf and Darling
- Apr 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- May 28, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 1, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 1
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-3-2009 by committee on Rules
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Young
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 79, Noes 13
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Danou and Molepske Jr.
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Representative Spanbauer added as a coauthor
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 6, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 9, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Feb 4, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes
- Feb 19, 2010 · Senate
Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote