Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 255

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits and payment of extended benefits; excluding recovery and reinvestment act moneys from the calculation of expenditure restraint payments; eligibility for participation in the programs of a community action agency; financial assistance under the Clean Water Fund Program and the Safe Drinking Water Loan Program; the confidentiality of pupil records provided to the Department of Public Instruction; financial assistance for criminal justice programs; authorizing political subdivisions to make residential energy efficiency improvement loans and impose special charges for the loans; definition of low-income household under energy and weatherization assistance programs; eligibility and notice changes for state continuation of coverage for health insurance; changes to enterprise zone jobs credits; providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures; granting rule-making authority; and making an appropriation.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Crime

This bill creates an appropriation of federal revenues that allows moneys

received under the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for

criminal justice programs to be used for that purpose.

economic development

Under current law, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) may designate

an area as an enterprise zone. The area designated as an enterprise zone must not

exceed 50 acres, and Commerce may designate no more than ten enterprise zones.

Commerce must consider a number of factors related to the area prior to designating

the area as an enterprise zone. These factors include the housing values and average

wages in the area, whether the area has experienced job losses or a population

decline, and whether designation as an enterprise zone would promote the creation

of jobs and economic and community development in the area.

This bill eliminates the requirement that the area to be designated as an

enterprise zone not exceed 50 acres. The bill requires Commerce to specify whether

the enterprise zone is located in a Tier I or Tier II county or municipality. Commerce

is directed to define "Tier I county or municipality" and "Tier II county or

municipality" by administrative rule. The bill also authorizes Commerce to consider

whether designation as an enterprise zone would promote the retention of jobs in the

area.

Under current law, a taxpayer who creates jobs in an enterprise zone may claim

an income and franchise tax credit equal to 7 percent of the taxpayer's payroll in the

enterprise zone that is paid to new full-time employees who earn more than $30,000,

but less than $100,000, in annual wages. In addition, the taxpayer may claim a credit

equal to the amount the taxpayer paid in the taxable year to provide certain

job-related training to the taxpayer's full-time employees in the enterprise zone.

Under this bill, a taxpayer who creates jobs in an enterprise zone located in a

Tier I county or municipality may claim an income and franchise tax credit equal to

no more than 7 percent of the taxpayer's payroll in the enterprise zone that is paid

to new full-time employees who earn more than $20,000, but less than $100,000, in

annual wages. A taxpayer who creates jobs in an enterprise zone located in a Tier

II county or municipality may claim an income and franchise tax credit equal to no

more than 7 percent of the taxpayer's payroll in the enterprise zone that is paid to

new full-time employees who earn more than $30,000, but less than $100,000, in

annual wages.

In addition, if the taxpayer is able to retain jobs in an enterprise zone, the

taxpayer may claim a credit equal to no more than 7 percent of the taxpayer's

enterprise zone payroll in a Tier I county or municipality that is paid to full-time

employees who earn more than $20,000, but less than $100,000, in annual wages,

less the amount paid to new full-time employees, or no more than 7 percent of the

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Nelson (D) , Pocan (D) , Sheridan (D)

3 cosponsors

Decker (D) , Hansen (D) , Miller (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 May 12, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 45

Passed 54–45 May 13, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 87, Noes 11

Passed 87–11 May 13, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 25, Noes 8

Passed 25–8 May 13, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pocan, Sheridan and Nelson;Cosponsored by Senators Miller, Decker and Hansen

  2. May 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to joint committee on Finance

  3. May 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance

  6. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  7. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended with emergency statement attached pursuant to s. 16.47 (2) Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by joint committee on Finance

  8. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to Calendar

  9. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Lothian

  10. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 laid on table, Ayes 54, Noes 45

  11. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 87, Noes 11

  14. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended and withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and taken up

  19. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  22. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 25, Noes 8

  23. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  25. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  26. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-14-2009

  29. May 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-15-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 11

  30. May 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Published 5-18-2009