Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
regulation of wind energy systems and granting rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not
place any restrictions on the installation or use of an energy system (a solar energy
system or a wind energy system) unless the restriction is for health or safety reasons,
does not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency, or
allows for an alternative comparable system. Current law defines "wind energy
system" as equipment that converts and then stores or transfers energy from the
wind into usable forms of energy.
This bill requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to promulgate rules
establishing common standards for political subdivisions to regulate the
construction and operation of wind energy systems. The bill also revises the
definition of "wind energy system" to include associated facilities of the equipment
specified under current law. The PSC's rules must specify the restrictions a political
subdivision may impose on the installation or use of such a system, and may include
subjects such as visual appearance, setback distances, decommissioning, shadow
flicker, electrical connections to the power grid, and interference with radio,
telephone, or television signals. The PSC must also promulgate rules specifying
requirements and procedures for a political subdivision to enforce such restrictions.
If a political subdivision chooses to regulate such systems, its ordinances may
not be more restrictive than the PSC rules. The bill also specifies various standards,
procedures for applicants, and approval timelines for political subdivisions that
must be contained in a political subdivision's ordinance regulating the systems.
The bill prohibits a political subdivision from prohibiting or restricting any
person from conducting tests to determine the suitability of a site for the possible
placement of a wind energy system, although the political subdivision may petition
the PSC to impose reasonable restrictions on the testing.
With regard to a proposed wind energy system that is one megawatt or larger,
the bill provides that any person who is aggrieved by a political subdivision's decision
or enforcement action may seek review by the PSC. If the PSC determines that the
political subdivision's decision or enforcement action does not comply with the
agency's rules or is unreasonable, it must issue a superseding decision and order an
appropriate remedy. The PSC's decision or order may be appealed to circuit court.
The bill specifies that if a county enacts an ordinance relating to the
construction or operation of a wind energy system, as provided by the bill, the county
ordinance applies only in the unincorporated parts of the county, except that if a town
enacts a similar ordinance, the more restrictive terms of the two ordinances apply
to the town.
Finally, the bill does not affect a provision under current law that exempts
certain electric generating facilities from local ordinances. Under current law, a
person may not construct an electric generating facility with a nominal operating
capacity of 100 megawatts or more unless the PSC grants a certificate of public
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1
Passed 11–1 Jul 8, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Soletski, Parisi, Montgomery, Black, Clark, Hilgenberg, Honadel, Mason, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pocan, Richards, Roys, Smith, Spanbauer, Stone, Suder, Townsend, Vruwink and Wood;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Hopper, Coggs, Hansen, Holperin, Kreitlow, Miller, Risser, Sullivan, Taylor and Wirch
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities
- May 12, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 12, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Energy and Utilities
- Jun 26, 2009 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Soletski
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Wood
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1