Assembly Bill 256
Regulation of wind energy systems and granting rule-making authority
Topics: County: Ordinance, Electric utility, Energy conservation, Municipality: Ordinance, Public Service Commission
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
May 5, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not place any restrictions on the installation or use of an energy system (a solar energy system or a wind energy system) unless the restriction is for health or safety reasons, does not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency, or allows for an alternative comparable system. Current law defines "wind energy system" as equipment that converts and then stores or transfers energy from the wind into usable forms of energy.
This bill requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to promulgate rules establishing common standards for political subdivisions to regulate the construction and operation of wind energy systems. The bill also revises the definition of "wind energy system" to include associated facilities of the equipment specified under current law. The PSC's rules must specify the restrictions a political subdivision may impose on the installation or use of such a system, and may include subjects such as visual appearance, setback distances, decommissioning, shadow flicker, electrical connections to the power grid, and interference with radio, telephone, or television signals. The PSC must also promulgate rules specifying requirements and procedures for a political subdivision to enforce such restrictions.
Read the full summary Show less
If a political subdivision chooses to regulate such systems, its ordinances may not be more restrictive than the PSC rules. The bill also specifies various standards, procedures for applicants, and approval timelines for political subdivisions that must be contained in a political subdivision's ordinance regulating the systems.
The bill prohibits a political subdivision from prohibiting or restricting any person from conducting tests to determine the suitability of a site for the possible placement of a wind energy system, although the political subdivision may petition the PSC to impose reasonable restrictions on the testing.
With regard to a proposed wind energy system that is one megawatt or larger, the bill provides that any person who is aggrieved by a political subdivision's decision or enforcement action may seek review by the PSC. If the PSC determines that the political subdivision's decision or enforcement action does not comply with the agency's rules or is unreasonable, it must issue a superseding decision and order an appropriate remedy. The PSC's decision or order may be appealed to circuit court.
The bill specifies that if a county enacts an ordinance relating to the construction or operation of a wind energy system, as provided by the bill, the county ordinance applies only in the unincorporated parts of the county, except that if a town enacts a similar ordinance, the more restrictive terms of the two ordinances apply to the town.
Finally, the bill does not affect a provision under current law that exempts certain electric generating facilities from local ordinances. Under current law, a person may not construct an electric generating facility with a nominal operating capacity of 100 megawatts or more unless the PSC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to the person. If the PSC has granted a CPCN to such a facility, and if installation or utilization of the facility is precluded or inhibited by a local ordinance, current law provides that the installation and utilization of the facility may nevertheless proceed. Because this bill does not affect that provision, the authority of a political subdivision to regulate a wind energy system under the bill is limited to those wind energy systems with a nominal operating capacity of less than 100 megawatts. However, the bill requires the PSC to consider the restrictions specified in the rules described above when the PSC determines whether to grant a CPCN to a wind energy system with a nominal operating capacity of 100 megawatts or more.
Who's behind it
20 lawmakers are its . 13 are Democrats, 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.
11 more lawmakers .
See all 31 names Hide the names
Authors (20)
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Honadel · Republican, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Phil Montgomery · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Jeffrey Stone · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Suder · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeffrey Wood · Independent, Assembly
Signed on in support (11)
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Randy Hopper · Republican, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities vote on an amendment
Passed, 11 to 1 · Jul 8, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jul 8, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jul 8, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 2.
-
May 12, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 12, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 5, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities.
-
May 5, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Soletski, Parisi, Montgomery, Black, Clark, Hilgenberg, Honadel, Mason, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pocan, Richards, Roys, Smith, Spanbauer, Stone, Suder, Townsend, Vruwink and Wood;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Hopper, Coggs, Hansen, Holperin, Kreitlow, Miller, Risser, Sullivan, Taylor and Wirch
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities
- May 12, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 12, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Energy and Utilities
- Jun 26, 2009 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Soletski
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Wood
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote