Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 256

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

regulation of wind energy systems and granting rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) may not

place any restrictions on the installation or use of an energy system (a solar energy

system or a wind energy system) unless the restriction is for health or safety reasons,

does not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency, or

allows for an alternative comparable system. Current law defines "wind energy

system" as equipment that converts and then stores or transfers energy from the

wind into usable forms of energy.

This bill requires the Public Service Commission (PSC) to promulgate rules

establishing common standards for political subdivisions to regulate the

construction and operation of wind energy systems. The bill also revises the

definition of "wind energy system" to include associated facilities of the equipment

specified under current law. The PSC's rules must specify the restrictions a political

subdivision may impose on the installation or use of such a system, and may include

subjects such as visual appearance, setback distances, decommissioning, shadow

flicker, electrical connections to the power grid, and interference with radio,

telephone, or television signals. The PSC must also promulgate rules specifying

requirements and procedures for a political subdivision to enforce such restrictions.

If a political subdivision chooses to regulate such systems, its ordinances may

not be more restrictive than the PSC rules. The bill also specifies various standards,

procedures for applicants, and approval timelines for political subdivisions that

must be contained in a political subdivision's ordinance regulating the systems.

The bill prohibits a political subdivision from prohibiting or restricting any

person from conducting tests to determine the suitability of a site for the possible

placement of a wind energy system, although the political subdivision may petition

the PSC to impose reasonable restrictions on the testing.

With regard to a proposed wind energy system that is one megawatt or larger,

the bill provides that any person who is aggrieved by a political subdivision's decision

or enforcement action may seek review by the PSC. If the PSC determines that the

political subdivision's decision or enforcement action does not comply with the

agency's rules or is unreasonable, it must issue a superseding decision and order an

appropriate remedy. The PSC's decision or order may be appealed to circuit court.

The bill specifies that if a county enacts an ordinance relating to the

construction or operation of a wind energy system, as provided by the bill, the county

ordinance applies only in the unincorporated parts of the county, except that if a town

enacts a similar ordinance, the more restrictive terms of the two ordinances apply

to the town.

Finally, the bill does not affect a provision under current law that exempts

certain electric generating facilities from local ordinances. Under current law, a

person may not construct an electric generating facility with a nominal operating

capacity of 100 megawatts or more unless the PSC grants a certificate of public

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Black (D) , Clark (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Honadel (R) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Montgomery (R) , Parisi (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Stone (R) , Suder (R) , Townsend (R) , Vruwink (D) , Wood (I)

11 cosponsors

Coggs (D) , Hansen (D) , Holperin (D) , Hopper (R) , Kreitlow (D) , Miller (D) , Plale (D) , Risser (D) , Sullivan (D) , Taylor (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1

Passed 11–1 Jul 8, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Soletski, Parisi, Montgomery, Black, Clark, Hilgenberg, Honadel, Mason, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Pocan, Richards, Roys, Smith, Spanbauer, Stone, Suder, Townsend, Vruwink and Wood;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Hopper, Coggs, Hansen, Holperin, Kreitlow, Miller, Risser, Sullivan, Taylor and Wirch

  2. May 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Energy and Utilities

  7. Jun 26, 2009 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)

  8. Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 11, Noes 1

  9. Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  10. Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-16-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by Representative Soletski

  13. Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Wood

  14. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1