Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
extraterritorial plat approval on basis of land's use.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law specifies whether a county, town, city, or village has the right to
approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision). Generally, the location of the
subdivision determines which local governmental unit or units have the right to
approve the plat. However, if a subdivision lies in the unincorporated area within
three miles of the corporate limits of a first, second, or third class city, or within one
and one-half miles of a fourth class city or village, the governing body of the city or
village has the right to approve the plat under its extraterritorial plat approval
jurisdiction, as well as the board of the town within which the subdivision lies and
the planning agency of the county within which the subdivision lies if the planning
agency employs on a full-time basis a professional engineer, a planner, or another
person charged with administering zoning or other planning legislation. Approval
of a plat is conditioned on, among other things, the plat's compliance with the local
ordinances and a comprehensive, master, or development plan of the local
governmental unit or units that have the right to approve the plat.
In
Wood v. City of Madison
, 2003 WI 24, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W. 2d 31, the
Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that a city with extraterritorial plat approval
jurisdiction over a plat could object to the plat on the basis of the proposed use of land
outside the city limits.
Wood
overruled
Boucher Lincoln-Mercury v. Madison Plan
Comm.
, 178 Wis. 2d 74, 503 N.W. 2d 265 (Ct. App. 1993), which held that
extraterritorial plat approval or denial based on the use of the land in the plat is
unilateral land use control (or zoning), and that the statutes require extraterritorial
zoning to be a cooperative effort between the city and the town in which the zoning
ordinance is in effect.
This bill prohibits a municipality (city or village) from denying approval of a
plat or certified survey map on the basis of the proposed use of land within the
extraterritorial plat approval jurisdiction of the municipality unless the denial is
based on a plan or regulations adopted under the statute referred to in
Boucher
Lincoln-Mercury
that sets out the requirements for the cooperative effort between
the municipality and the town for extraterritorial zoning.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Nov 16, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39
Passed 56–39 Feb 23, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Senate amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 25, Noes 8
Passed 25–8 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Refused to refer to committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 11, Noes 22
Failed 11–22 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 27, Noes 6
Passed 27–6 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Smith, Jorgensen, Roth, Hubler, Schneider, Vruwink, Danou, Fields, Clark, Dexter, Ripp, Kerkman, Kestell, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, A. Ott, Ballweg and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Holperin, Harsdorf and Olsen
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs
- Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Berceau and Molepske Jr.
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 2 not germane well taken
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Representative Hilgenberg added as a coauthor
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Berceau and Molepske Jr.
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m)
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Refused to refer to committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 11, Noes 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lassa
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 25, Noes 8
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 27, Noes 6
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 19, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 399
- May 21, 2010 · Assembly
Published 6-1-2010