Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 260

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

extraterritorial plat approval on basis of land's use.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law specifies whether a county, town, city, or village has the right to

approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision). Generally, the location of the

subdivision determines which local governmental unit or units have the right to

approve the plat. However, if a subdivision lies in the unincorporated area within

three miles of the corporate limits of a first, second, or third class city, or within one

and one-half miles of a fourth class city or village, the governing body of the city or

village has the right to approve the plat under its extraterritorial plat approval

jurisdiction, as well as the board of the town within which the subdivision lies and

the planning agency of the county within which the subdivision lies if the planning

agency employs on a full-time basis a professional engineer, a planner, or another

person charged with administering zoning or other planning legislation. Approval

of a plat is conditioned on, among other things, the plat's compliance with the local

ordinances and a comprehensive, master, or development plan of the local

governmental unit or units that have the right to approve the plat.

In

Wood v. City of Madison

, 2003 WI 24, 260 Wis. 2d 71, 659 N.W. 2d 31, the

Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that a city with extraterritorial plat approval

jurisdiction over a plat could object to the plat on the basis of the proposed use of land

outside the city limits.

Wood

overruled

Boucher Lincoln-Mercury v. Madison Plan

Comm.

, 178 Wis. 2d 74, 503 N.W. 2d 265 (Ct. App. 1993), which held that

extraterritorial plat approval or denial based on the use of the land in the plat is

unilateral land use control (or zoning), and that the statutes require extraterritorial

zoning to be a cooperative effort between the city and the town in which the zoning

ordinance is in effect.

This bill prohibits a municipality (city or village) from denying approval of a

plat or certified survey map on the basis of the proposed use of land within the

extraterritorial plat approval jurisdiction of the municipality unless the denial is

based on a plan or regulations adopted under the statute referred to in

Boucher

Lincoln-Mercury

that sets out the requirements for the cooperative effort between

the municipality and the town for extraterritorial zoning.

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Dexter (D) , Fields (D) , Gunderson (R) , Hubler (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Ripp (R) , Roth (R) , Schneider (D) , Smith (D) , Suder (R) , Vruwink (D)

6 cosponsors

Harsdorf (R) , Hilgenberg (D) , Holperin (D) , Kreitlow (D) , Olsen (R) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 14, Noes 0

Passed 14–0 Nov 16, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39

Passed 56–39 Feb 23, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 4, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Senate amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 25, Noes 8

Passed 25–8 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Refused to refer to committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 11, Noes 22

Failed 11–22 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 27, Noes 6

Passed 27–6 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Smith, Jorgensen, Roth, Hubler, Schneider, Vruwink, Danou, Fields, Clark, Dexter, Ripp, Kerkman, Kestell, Bies, Brooks, Gunderson, A. Ott, Ballweg and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Holperin, Harsdorf and Olsen

  2. May 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs

  3. Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Renewable Energy and Rural Affairs, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  6. Nov 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 by committee on Rules

  8. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Berceau and Molepske Jr.

  9. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 2 not germane well taken

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Hilgenberg added as a coauthor

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Berceau and Molepske Jr.

  17. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 39

  18. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology

  20. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m)

  24. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Refused to refer to committee on Senate Organization, Ayes 11, Noes 22

  27. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Lassa

  28. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 25, Noes 8

  29. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  31. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 27, Noes 6

  32. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  35. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  36. May 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 399

  37. May 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 6-1-2010