Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 265

The regulation of income tax refund anticipation loans and providing a penalty

Topics: Financial Institutions, Department of, Income tax: Refund, Small loan

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 12, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires a creditor to make specified disclosures before a "refund anticipation loan" (RAL) is made to a customer. An RAL is defined as an agreement under which a creditor arranges to be repaid for a loan directly from the proceeds of a customer's income tax refund. Current law defines "creditor" to include a merchant who regularly engages in arranging an RAL for a customer, as well as the merchant who makes the RAL. The disclosure requirements are enforced by the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI).

This bill creates additional requirements, also enforced by DFI, for a creditor who makes or arranges an RAL. In addition to the disclosures required under current law, the bill requires a creditor to disclose the fee charged if an RAL is not approved. The bill also requires a creditor to disclose that: 1) the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Revenue do not guarantee refunds; 2) an RAL is a loan and is not the customer's actual refund; and 3) a customer may rescind an RAL, as described below. Additionally, the bill requires disclosure of a chart indicating the estimated amount of time that a customer is expected to receive either a refund or loan for different filing and payment options, as well as for each loan program offered or arranged by the creditor. The chart must also indicate whether up-front payment of a tax preparation fee is required for each filing and payment option and each loan program. Also, the creditor must disclose how much of a refund a customer is expected to receive after charges and fees for the RAL are deducted from the customer's tax refund. Under the bill, the foregoing disclosures, as well as the disclosures required under current law, must be in a type size no smaller than 10 point. The bill also incorporates into the statutes certain requirements under DFI's rules, including requirements regarding the timing of the disclosures, as well as the manner for disclosing annual percentage interest rates of RALs. In addition, the bill incorporates into the statutes a DFI rule that requires a creditor to make certain disclosures that are required under federal law at the time that the creditor actually makes a loan.

Read the full summary

The bill also allows a customer to rescind an RAL before the close of business on the next business day after the RAL is made. The bill provides that the only fee a creditor may charge a customer for rescinding an RAL is a fee equal to the administrative cost of establishing an account with a financial institution to electronically receive the customer's refund. The bill prohibits a creditor from doing any of the following: 1) misrepresenting a material fact of condition of an RAL; 2) failing to process promptly an RAL application; 3) offering or arranging an RAL in which the amount of the loan, including charges and fees related to the loan, tax preparation, or electronic filing, exceed the customer's anticipated refund; and 4) taking or arranging a security interest in any property other than the customer's tax refund.

The bill provides that a creditor who violates the bill is liable to a customer in amount equal to the greater of: 1) twice the finance charge imposed for the RAL; or 2) the actual damages sustained by the customer due to the violation. The amount under the first component of the foregoing formula is subject to a minimum of $100 and a maximum of $1,000. Current law creates similar liability for violations of the disclosures required under current law.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 17 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (3)

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 3, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. May 12, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

  4. May 12, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Roys, Hintz, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Black, Dexter, Grigsby, Hebl, Richards, Schneider, Seidel, Sinicki, Smith, Soletski, Young, Zepnick and Hixson;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Coggs and Taylor

  2. May 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Jun 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor