Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 27

The definition of sexual intercourse for the crime of incest

Topics: Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Sex crimes

Became law

The governor signed it on May 21, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 5, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 86 to 10

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 13, 2009

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 13

Latest entry in the official record, May 27, 2009: “Published 6-5-2009”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person who has sexual intercourse with a blood relative, if the relationship would prohibit them from legally marrying, is guilty of a felony.

"Sexual intercourse" is defined to require vulvar penetration. This bill expands the definition of "sexual intercourse" to include cunnilingus, fellatio, or anal intercourse or any other intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person's body or of any object into the genital or anal opening.

Read the full summary

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

16 representatives are its ⁠. 10 are Democrats, 5 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 1 · Apr 17, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 18 to 78 · Apr 23, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 18, Noes 78”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 86 to 10 · Apr 23, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 86, Noes 10”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 27, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. May 21, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 13.

  3. May 21, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. May 13, 2009

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Apr 24, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  6. Apr 23, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  7. Apr 23, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 86 to 10.

  8. Apr 23, 2009

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-23-2009” (the official wording)

  9. Apr 23, 2009

    “Placed on the calendar of 4-23-2009 following AB 103” (the official wording)

  10. Apr 17, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Apr 17, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  12. Mar 5, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Mar 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Feb 17, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Feb 5, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  16. Feb 5, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Cullen, Zepnick, A. Williams, Sinicki, Staskunas, Gundrum, Kerkman, Ziegelbauer, Berceau, Townsend, Spanbauer, Vruwink, Strachota, Barca, Turner and Soletski;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Taylor, Sullivan, Coggs, Olsen, Lazich, A. Lasee, Darling and Plale

  2. Feb 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  8. Apr 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-23-2009 by committee on Rules

  10. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on the calendar of 4-23-2009 following AB 103

  11. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-23-2009

  12. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 18, Noes 78

  14. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 86, Noes 10

  17. Apr 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Apr 23, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Apr 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  20. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing and take up

  21. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. May 13, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. May 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. May 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. May 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-20-2009

  29. May 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-21-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 13

  30. May 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Published 6-5-2009

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote