Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 271

Professional land surveyors, the practice of professional land surveying, surveying land abutting navigable waters, and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Maps, Plats, Surveying and surveyors, Waterways and water power

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Oct 27, 2009, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 19, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 27, 2009

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may not practice land surveying or represent that he or she is a land surveyor unless the land surveyor section (section) of the examining board of architects, landscape architects, professional engineers, designers and land surveyors (board) has issued a certificate of registration or permit to the person. "Land surveying" is defined as determining the location of land boundaries and boundary corners; preparing maps that show the shape and area of tracts of land or subdivisions or the layout of roads, streets, or rights-of-way; or preparing official plats or maps of land in this state.

This bill replaces "land surveying" with the term "practice of professional land surveying" and defines the term as any of the following:

Read the full summary

1. Establishing, restoring, or perpetuating private or public land boundaries and boundary corners.

2. Preparing maps for establishing the boundaries of interests in real property that depict any of the following: a) the shape and area of tracts of land or the subdivision or consolidation of tracts; b) the layout and rights-of-way of roads or streets; c) air, water, or property rights; or d) public or private easements.

3. Preparing assessors' or official plats or maps of lands in this state.

4. Measuring and analyzing a tract of land to determine its legal description.

5. Designing or coordinating designs for platting or subdividing tracts of land.

6. Applying knowledge or experience about land surveying to assist in the development, use, or management of geographic or land information systems.

7. Performing cartographic, construction, or geodetic surveying in connection with any of the practices described in the above items.

8. Providing consultation services related to any of the practices described in the above items.

The bill also replaces the certificate of registration requirement under current law with a licensure requirement. Therefore, under the bill with certain exceptions, a person may not engage in the practice of professional land surveying or represent that he or she is a professional land surveyor unless the person is issued a license or permit by the section. Also, after July 1, 2018, the bill requires employees of this state and public utilities to obtain a license or permit to engage in the practice of professional land surveying. Such employees are exempt from the certificate of registration and permit requirements under current law.

In addition, the bill changes the name of the section to the professional land surveyor section and changes the name of the board to the examining board of architects, landscape architects, professional engineers, designers and professional land surveyors. The bill also replaces various references under current law to "registered land surveyor" with "professional land surveyor."

For purposes of platting lands or preparing survey maps that involve ordinary high water marks (OHWMs), a professional surveyor may incorporate an ordinary high water mark that has been identified by the Department of Natural Resources or that has otherwise been identified by law or may approximate the ordinary high water mark. The bill requires that a statement be included on the face of a plat or map explaining that the land below the OHWM is subject to the public trust doctrine for navigable waters and that exposed land between the OHWM and the water's edge is to be used exclusively by the owner of the adjacent waterfront property, unless otherwise provided by law.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 21, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 24, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 2.

  3. Mar 24, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  4. Jan 7, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Oct 29, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development.

  6. Oct 28, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  7. Oct 27, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  8. Oct 27, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Oct 27, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Oct 21, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Oct 21, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  12. Jul 1, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. May 28, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. May 19, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  15. May 19, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Clark, Roys, Staskunas, Berceau, Danou, Gunderson, Hubler, Jorgensen, Mason, Milroy, A. Ott, Smith and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, Lehman, Cowles, Holperin, Schultz and Taylor

  2. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. May 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Aug 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Schultz withdrawn as a cosponsor

  6. Oct 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark

  7. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  9. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  10. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)

  13. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark

  15. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark

  16. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  17. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  18. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  19. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to return to amendable stage

  21. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark

  22. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  23. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  24. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  27. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Hilgenberg added as a coauthor

  28. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Oct 28, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  30. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development

  31. Jan 7, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  32. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Risser

  33. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  34. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  35. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Economic Development, Ayes 5, Noes 2

  36. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  37. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote