Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 273

Podiatrist-patient privilege, immunity exemption for podiatrists providing emergency care at athletic events, allowing podiatrists to determine an illness or injury and complete forms for the purpose of granting assistance to needy veterans, allowing podiatrists to determine disability for the purpose of issuing certain hunting permits, cooperatives organized to provide sickness care, the Podiatrists Affiliated Credentialing Board, allowing podiatrists to certify driver school instructors' physical fitness, allowing Medical Assistance recipients to freely choose among podiatrists, and giving equal weight to certifications of disability by podiatrists for insurance purposes

Topics: Athletics, Damage (personal injury), Drivers' education, Game: Hunting license, Insurance: Health, Medical assistance, Persons with disabilities, Podiatry, Reorganization of state government, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles, Veterans Affairs, Department of

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Dec 11, 2009. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 19, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Sep 17, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Dec 11, 2009.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, certain health care providers, including physicians, first responders, and dentists, who render voluntary health care to a participant in an athletic event or contest at a school are immune from civil liability for their acts or omissions. The immunity applies only if certain conditions are met, including that the health care is rendered at the site of event or contest and that there is no compensation paid to the health care provider. This bill adds podiatrists to those who are immune from civil liability for their acts or omissions while rendering voluntary health care to a participant in an athletic event or contest at a school.

Currently, a communication by a patient to certain health care professionals, including physicians, chiropractors, and psychologists, is privileged. The patient may refuse to disclose, and can prevent the health care provider from disclosing, a communication made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of the patient. This bill adds podiatrists to those whose communication regarding diagnosis or treatment may be prevented from being disclosed by the patient.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issues driver school instructors' licenses. DOT may not issue an instructor's license to an applicant unless the applicant submits a statement completed by a physician or another specified medical care provider certifying that the applicant is physically fit to teach driving. This bill adds podiatrists to the list of medical care providers that may certify to DOT that an applicant is physically fit to teach driving.

Under current law, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) may grant assistance to needy veterans who have suffered a loss of income due to illness, injury, or natural disaster. By rule, DVA has defined an illness or injury as a physical or mental health problem that is diagnosed by a physician, dentist, optometrist, or audiologist. This bill expands the health care providers who can diagnose an illness or injury for DVA purposes to include podiatrists.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is authorized to issue certain hunting permits that authorize hunting by persons who have a physical disability (specialized permits). Among the privileges granted by these specialized permits is the privilege of hunting with assistance rendered by another person. In order to obtain a specialized permit from DNR, a person must submit an application furnished by DNR that includes a statement or report prepared and signed by a licensed physician or chiropractor verifying that the applicant is physically disabled. A person may also obtain a specialized permit even if the person would otherwise be ineligible for a specialized permit if DNR, based on the recommendation of a licensed physician or chiropractor, determines that the issuance of the permit complies with the intent of the law. This bill authorizes an applicant for a specialized permit to submit a statement, report, or recommendation from a licensed podiatrist, as well as from a physician or chiropractor, in support of a specialized permit application.

This bill changes the name of the Podiatrists Affiliated Credentialing Board to the Podiatry Affiliated Credentialing Board.

Current law permits the organization of a cooperative to provide sickness care through contracts with physicians, medical societies, chiropractors, optometrists, dentists, dental societies, hospitals, and others. This bill adds podiatrists to the list of enumerated providers of sickness care.

Under current law, life insurers, health insurers, and disability insurers are required to give equal weight to certifications of disability by physicians and by chiropractors, with respect to matters within the scope of the professional license of each. This bill requires those insurers also to give equal weight to certifications of disability by podiatrists with respect to matters within the scope of their professional licenses.

Current law provides that a person who is eligible for health care coverage under the Medical Assistance (MA) program may, unless limited by the Department of Health Services, which administers MA, use the provider of his or her choice, and lists the types of providers for which the person has free choice. The list includes physicians, chiropractors, dentists, and pharmacists. This bill adds podiatrists to the list of providers for which a person who is eligible for MA has free choice.

Who's behind it

14 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (7)

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Public Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Sep 8, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 0 · Nov 4, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 26, 2010

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Dec 11, 2009

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Dec 8, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Nov 4, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  6. Sep 23, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  7. Sep 18, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  8. Sep 17, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Sep 17, 2009

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  10. Sep 8, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Sep 8, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  12. Jul 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. May 19, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Public Health.

  14. May 19, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Barca, Zigmunt, Benedict, Turner, Kerkman, Steinbrink, Friske, Mason, Townsend, Zepnick, Ballweg, Berceau, Petrowski and Strachota;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Taylor, Plale, Schultz, Wirch and Holperin

  2. May 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health

  3. Jul 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Aug 25, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  6. Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-17-2009 by committee on Rules

  8. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Representatives Pasch, Spanbauer and Hixson added as coauthors

  9. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Sep 18, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  16. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  18. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  20. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-8-2009

  28. Dec 11, 2009 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 12-11-2009

  29. May 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  30. May 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote