Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 280

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

seizure of a computer used to commit a crime and providing a penalty.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the state or a local law enforcement agency may acquire

certain property involved in the commission of crime through a forfeiture proceeding,

which is generally initiated after the end of the criminal case to which it relates. The

forfeiture law applies to all property directly or indirectly derived from the

commission of a crime. It also covers certain other property related to the

commission of a crime, including: 1) an illegal controlled substance and equipment

used in committing a crime relating to a controlled substance; 2) a vehicle used to

transport property used or received in committing a felony; 3) a vehicle used in

committing a crime relating to prostitution; 4) property used in committing a

stalking offense or a criminal violation of a domestic abuse, child abuse, or

harassment restraining order or injunction; and 5) pirated, bootlegged, and

counterfeit recordings and any equipment used to make them. Current law also

permits the state or a local law enforcement agency to retain contraband that it has

seized, which includes machines or materials (including computers) that are used to

create other contraband items.

Under this bill, a computer that is used, with the knowledge and consent of its

owner, in the commission of a crime is subject to forfeiture, regardless of whether it

is contraband. If a computer is forfeited under the bill, the law enforcement agency

that seized it may retain it for its own use, donate it to a nonprofit organization or

another government agency, or sell it and, in general, retain 50 percent of the

proceeds of the sale (with the remainder being deposited in the school fund).

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bies (R) , Gunderson (R) , Kerkman (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Suder (R) , Van Akkeren (D)

2 cosponsors

Leibham (R) , Olsen (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Sep 4, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. May 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Van Akkeren, Kerkman, Staskunas, Townsend, Spanbauer, Gunderson, Suder, Bies and LeMahieu;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham and Olsen

  2. May 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Aug 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Criminal Justice

  9. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  11. Sep 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  12. Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-17-2009 by committee on Rules

  13. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 9-17-2009

  14. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from calendar and referred to committee on Rules

  15. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Townsend withdrawn as a coauthor

  16. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Van Akkeren and Bies

  17. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Van Akkeren and Bies

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-3-2009 by committee on Rules

  19. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  21. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  24. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  26. Nov 9, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  27. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1