Assembly Bill 288
Education and work experience requirements for registration as a professional engineer and examinations for professional engineering credentials
Topics: Engineer
Became law
The governor signed it on May 17, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 2, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Oct 29, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 22, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 350
Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Generally, under current law, no person may practice professional engineering in this state or convey the impression that the person is a professional engineer unless the person is registered with the Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers, and Land Surveyors (examining board). Currently, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must submit satisfactory evidence of one of the following: 1) graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years plus a record of four or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, 2) a record of eight or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, 3) a record of 12 or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice engineering, or 4) graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years and eight years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice engineering. Current law provides that graduation from an engineering course at a school approved by the examining board is equivalent to four years of experience, that each year of engineering study completed at such a school is equivalent to one year of experience, and that graduation from an engineering course at a school not approved by the examining board is equivalent to two years of experience.
Under this bill, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must submit satisfactory evidence of either of the following: 1) graduation from an approved engineering course of not less than four years and a record of four or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, or 2) graduation from an approved engineering course of not less than two years and a record of six or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work.
Read the full summary Show less
Currently, an applicant may not be registered as a professional engineer unless the applicant passes an examination that includes questions on the design needs of people with physical disabilities and the relevant statutes and codes, except that an applicant who applies on the basis of graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years and eight years of experience is not required to pass an examination. Under the bill, all applicants are required to pass an examination, but the examination is not required to include questions on the design needs of people with disabilities or the relevant statutes or codes.
Current law requires the examining board to make an applicant's examination papers available to the applicant for review for one year after the examination. Also under current law, an applicant may request a review of the applicant's examination, and the examining board must provide the reasons for a failing grade. The bill deletes the retention and review requirements.
Who's behind it
10 lawmakers are its . 6 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 12 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Gottlieb · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Gunderson · Republican, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Labor vote on an amendment
Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 27, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 9, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 17, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 17, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 350.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 9, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 16, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 3, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Oct 27, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 27, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Oct 14, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 15, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 2, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.
-
Jun 2, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Gottlieb, Townsend, Zepnick, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Kerkman, Danou, Petrowski and Gunderson;Cosponsored by Senators Plale and Taylor
- Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Jun 15, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 18, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 350
- May 17, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-27-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote