Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 288

Education and work experience requirements for registration as a professional engineer and examinations for professional engineering credentials

Topics: Engineer

Became law

The governor signed it on May 17, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 2, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 29, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 350

Latest entry in the official record, May 17, 2010: “Published 5-27-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Generally, under current law, no person may practice professional engineering in this state or convey the impression that the person is a professional engineer unless the person is registered with the Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers, and Land Surveyors (examining board). Currently, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must submit satisfactory evidence of one of the following: 1) graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years plus a record of four or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, 2) a record of eight or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, 3) a record of 12 or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice engineering, or 4) graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years and eight years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice engineering. Current law provides that graduation from an engineering course at a school approved by the examining board is equivalent to four years of experience, that each year of engineering study completed at such a school is equivalent to one year of experience, and that graduation from an engineering course at a school not approved by the examining board is equivalent to two years of experience.

Under this bill, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must submit satisfactory evidence of either of the following: 1) graduation from an approved engineering course of not less than four years and a record of four or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, or 2) graduation from an approved engineering course of not less than two years and a record of six or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work.

Read the full summary

Currently, an applicant may not be registered as a professional engineer unless the applicant passes an examination that includes questions on the design needs of people with physical disabilities and the relevant statutes and codes, except that an applicant who applies on the basis of graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years and eight years of experience is not required to pass an examination. Under the bill, all applicants are required to pass an examination, but the examination is not required to include questions on the design needs of people with disabilities or the relevant statutes or codes.

Current law requires the examining board to make an applicant's examination papers available to the applicant for review for one year after the examination. Also under current law, an applicant may request a review of the applicant's examination, and the examining board must provide the reasons for a failing grade. The bill deletes the retention and review requirements.

Who's behind it

10 lawmakers are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 27, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 17, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 17, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 350.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Apr 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Mar 16, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Nov 3, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  8. Oct 29, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  9. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Oct 29, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Oct 27, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Oct 27, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  13. Oct 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jun 15, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jun 2, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  16. Jun 2, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Gottlieb, Townsend, Zepnick, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Kerkman, Danou, Petrowski and Gunderson;Cosponsored by Senators Plale and Taylor

  2. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Jun 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  5. Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  9. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  15. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  21. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  23. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  24. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  26. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  27. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. May 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  34. May 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 350

  35. May 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-27-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote