Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 288

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

education and work experience requirements for registration as a professional engineer and examinations for professional engineering credentials.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Generally, under current law, no person may practice professional engineering

in this state or convey the impression that the person is a professional engineer

unless the person is registered with the Examining Board of Architects, Landscape

Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers, and Land Surveyors (examining

board). Currently, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must

submit satisfactory evidence of one of the following: 1) graduation from an

engineering course of not less than four years plus a record of four or more years of

experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of

engineering work, 2) a record of eight or more years of experience indicating the

applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work, 3) a record of 12

or more years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice

engineering, or 4) graduation from an engineering course of not less than four years

and eight years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to practice

engineering. Current law provides that graduation from an engineering course at

a school approved by the examining board is equivalent to four years of experience,

that each year of engineering study completed at such a school is equivalent to one

year of experience, and that graduation from an engineering course at a school not

approved by the examining board is equivalent to two years of experience.

Under this bill, an applicant for registration as a professional engineer must

submit satisfactory evidence of either of the following: 1) graduation from an

approved engineering course of not less than four years and a record of four or more

years of experience indicating the applicant is competent to be placed in charge of

engineering work, or 2) graduation from an approved engineering course of not less

than two years and a record of six or more years of experience indicating the

applicant is competent to be placed in charge of engineering work.

Currently, an applicant may not be registered as a professional engineer unless

the applicant passes an examination that includes questions on the design needs of

people with physical disabilities and the relevant statutes and codes, except that an

applicant who applies on the basis of graduation from an engineering course of not

less than four years and eight years of experience is not required to pass an

examination. Under the bill, all applicants are required to pass an examination, but

the examination is not required to include questions on the design needs of people

with disabilities or the relevant statutes or codes.

Current law requires the examining board to make an applicant's examination

papers available to the applicant for review for one year after the examination. Also

under current law, an applicant may request a review of the applicant's examination,

and the examining board must provide the reasons for a failing grade. The bill

deletes the retention and review requirements.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Danou (D) , Gottlieb (R) , Gunderson (R) , Jorgensen (D) , Kerkman (R) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Petrowski (R) , Townsend (R) , Zepnick (D)

2 cosponsors

Plale (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Oct 27, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 9, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Gottlieb, Townsend, Zepnick, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Kerkman, Danou, Petrowski and Gunderson;Cosponsored by Senators Plale and Taylor

  2. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Jun 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  5. Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  9. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  15. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  21. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  23. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  24. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  26. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  27. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  29. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. May 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  34. May 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-13-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 350

  35. May 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-27-2010