Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 289

Creating separate regulatory requirements for certain future service contracts

Topics: Contracts, Mercantile establishment, Trade practice

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 2, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection regulates future service contracts, defined as contracts whose primary purpose is to provide a customer with the right to purchase goods or services or to rent video recordings from a contractor. Generally, future service contracts must be in writing, may not provide the contractor more than 12 months in unearned fees, may not contain a renewal clause, and must grant customers rights against a successor to a contractor's interests and the right to cancel the contract within the first three months of the contract term or within three days after the customer's first purchase or rental worth more than $25, whichever occurs first. Also under current law, a contractor must maintain a $25,000 bond to cover customers who lose amounts prepaid to a contractor because the contractor has become insolvent or has ceased to conduct business.

This bill creates a new category of future service contracts. Under the bill, these contracts may have a term not to exceed three years, must grant the customer rights against a successor to the contractor's interests, must permit the customer to cancel the contract without penalty until midnight on the third day after entering into the contract, must contain a notice of the right to cancel on a separate page, and must permit the customer to cancel an order if the order is not delivered by the date it was promised or to the address where the customer requested delivery. A contractor who enters into such a contract must maintain a $250,000 bond to cover customer losses.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jul 21, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jun 2, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  4. Jun 2, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Fields, M. Williams, Townsend, Jorgensen, Petrowski, Brooks, A. Ott, Nerison, Lothian, Danou and Gunderson;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Plale and Darling

  2. Jun 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jul 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate