Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 307

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

penalties and private actions for violations of restrictions on telephone solicitations.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law regulates telephone solicitation, defined as the unsolicited

initiation of a telephone conversation for the purpose of encouraging the recipient of

the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or services. Generally, under current

law, a telephone solicitor may not make a telephone solicitation to a residential

customer if the customer's telephone number is included in a directory, maintained

by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP), listing

residential customers who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations. Violations

of current provisions regulating telephone solicitation are subject to a forfeiture of

$100.

This bill increases the penalty for a violation to a forfeiture of not less than

$1,000 nor more than $10,000. The bill also permits a person who suffers damages

as a result of a violation to bring an action for injunctive relief and for actual damages

or $500 per violation, whichever is greater.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Berceau (D) , Black (D) , Gunderson (R) , Hintz (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Roys (D) , Schneider (D) , Zepnick (D)

5 cosponsors

Coggs (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D)

Full history

  1. Jun 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Roys, Schneider, Berceau, Black, A. Ott, Jorgensen, Pope-Roberts, Zepnick, Gunderson and Hintz;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Taylor, Coggs, Hansen and Vinehout

  2. Jun 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jun 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1