Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
authorizing cities and towns, and expanding the authority of villages, to create combined protective services departments.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally under current law a village with a population of at least 5,000 is
required to provide police protection services by creating its own police department,
by contracting for police protection services with a city, village, town, or county or by
creating a joint police department with another city, village, or town. Also under
current law, in general, a village with a population of at least 5,500 is required to
provide fire protection services by creating its own fire department, by contracting
for fire protection services with a city, village, or town, or by creating a joint fire
department with another city, village, or town.
Current law also authorizes any village to provide police and fire protection
services in one of two additional ways. The first way is by using a combined
protective services department, which is neither a police department nor a fire
department, which was created before January 1, 1987, and in which the same
person may be required to perform police protection and fire protection duties,
subject to some limitations on consecutive hours that may be worked in police
protection. The second way is by requiring persons in a police department or fire
department, alone or in combination with persons designated as police officers or fire
fighters, to perform police protection and fire protection duties, subject to some
limitations on consecutive hours that may be worked in police protection and subject
to the limitation that those persons were required to perform those duties before
January 1, 1987. In either case, the village may designate any person required to
perform police protection and fire protection duties as primarily a police officer or fire
fighter for purposes related to presumptions related to certain employment-related
diseases.
Generally under current law, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th class cities (presently all cities
other than Milwaukee) with populations of at least 4,000 must have police
departments and fire departments, and may have joint departments with other
cities, villages, or towns. Such cities are generally required to have a board of police
and fire commissioners, which appoint the police and fire chiefs who, in turn, appoint
subordinates subject to approval by the board. Current law also authorizes a city to
abolish its police department if it enters into a contract with a county under which
the sheriff provides law enforcement services to the city.
Under a decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court,
Local Union No. 487,
IAFF-CIO, v. City of Eau Claire
, 147 Wis. 2d 519 (1989), cities may not create
combined protective services departments or require persons in a police department
or fire department, alone or in combination with persons designated as police officers
or fire fighters, to perform police protection and fire protection duties.
This bill authorizes 2nd, 3rd, and 4th class cities, and towns, to provide police
and fire protection services in the same two additional ways that villages may do so,
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Gottlieb (R) , Gunderson (R) , Gundrum (R) , Hintz (D) , Kaufert (R) , Kessler (D) , Knodl (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Lothian (R) , Mason (D) , Montgomery (R) , Nass (R) , Ripp (R) , Roys (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Townsend (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Wood (I) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2
Passed 6–2 Apr 15, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 9, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ziegelbauer, Hintz, Kessler, Roys, A. Williams, Ballweg, Bies, Gottlieb, Mason, Gunderson, Gundrum, Kaufert, Knodl, LeMahieu, Lothian, Montgomery, Nass, Ripp, Spanbauer, Townsend, Van Roy, Vos and Wood;Cosponsored by Senators Cowles, Darling, Kapanke, A. Lasee, Lazich and Schultz
- Jun 9, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Jun 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 26, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 29, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 6, Noes 2
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1