Assembly Bill 314
Pesticide use by railroads, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation
Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Data processing, Pests, Police, Railroad
Became law
The governor signed it on May 13, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 16, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Sep 22, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 286
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) administers laws that regulate the sale and use of pesticides, including herbicides.
This bill requires a railroad to annually make information about its pesticide use available to the railroad's employees and those who own land adjacent to the railroad's rights-of-way. The bill generally prohibits a railroad from requiring a person to work in an area to which a pesticide has been applied within 24 hours of the application of the pesticide.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill requires DATCP to establish, by rule, fees to be paid by railroad companies to cover the costs DATCP incurs under the bill. The bill also requires DATCP to promulgate rules to limit the times and weather conditions in which pesticides may be applied by railroads to prevent damage to lands adjoining rights-of-way and to protect the health of employees of railroads and their contractors.
Who's behind it
14 lawmakers are its . All 14 are Democrats.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 19 names Hide the names
Authors (14)
- Annette Williams · Democrat, Assembly
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (5)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote on an amendment
Passed, 14 to 0 · Sep 16, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Failed, 41 to 54 · Sep 22, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 41, Noes 54”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 69 to 26 · Sep 22, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 26”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Commerce vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Apr 7, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 29 to 4 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 29, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 62 to 35 · Apr 22, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 13, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 286.
-
May 11, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 22, 2010
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Senate passed it too, 29 to 4.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 14, 2010
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)
-
Apr 14, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Apr 7, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Apr 7, 2010
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Mar 23, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 24, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail.
-
Sep 23, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Assembly passed it, 69 to 26.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Sep 21, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 16, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Sep 16, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 0.
-
Jul 29, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 16, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.
-
Jun 16, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Molepske Jr., Berceau, Richards, Sinicki, Milroy, Black, Benedict, Turner, Zigmunt, Jorgensen, Roys, A. Williams, Soletski and Smith;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Lassa, Plale, Hansen and Lehman
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Jul 28, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Jul 29, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 20, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Molepske Jr.
- Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 2, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by committee on Natural Resources
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Rules
- Sep 21, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 2 adopted
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Refused to refer to committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 41, Noes 54
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 69, Noes 26
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Sep 24, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Mar 1, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Plale
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 29, Noes 4
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:03 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 35
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Action ordered immediately messaged
- May 4, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 11, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 286
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-26-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote