Assembly Bill 326
Committing fraud on certain service providers and providing a penalty
Topics: Crime and criminals, Fraud, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Mercantile establishment
Stopped in committee
It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 19, 2009
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It sat with the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a person may not fraudulently obtain lodging, food or beverage, gasoline, taxicab service, or admission to a recreational or entertainment venue. Current law defines fraud as an intentional refusal to pay for the item, service, or admission when the bill is due; giving false information to the provider of the item, service, or admission in order to gain admission or avoid payment; or issuing a worthless check to pay for the item, service, or admission.
A person who fraudulently obtains an item, service, or admission that is worth $2500 or less is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to nine months, or both. If the value of the item, service, or admission is more than $2500, the person is guilty of a Class I felony and may be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to three years and six months, or both.
Read the full summary Show less
In addition, current law allows the victim of a person who fraudulently obtained lodging, food or beverage, gasoline, taxicab service, or admission to a recreational or amusement venue to seek a civil judgment against the person for the cost of the item, service, or admission; property damage and other costs; and attorney fees and exemplary damages of up to $300.
This bill prohibits a person from fraudulently obtaining a service from a service provider. Under the bill, a service provider is a merchant who provides a service to a retail customer without a written contract and with the expectation that the customer will pay for the service upon completion of the service. The bill defines fraud against a service provider as failing or refusing to pay for a service rendered, with the intent to deprive the service provider of the full price of the service. The bill attaches the same criminal penalties and civil liability as are attached under current law to fraudulently obtaining lodging, food or beverage, gasoline, taxicab service, or admission to a recreational or entertainment venue.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
17 lawmakers are its . All 17 are Republicans.
10 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Gunderson · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Lothian · Republican, Assembly
- Phil Montgomery · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Rich Zipperer · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (10)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Theodore Kanavas · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 4, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jul 30, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jul 8, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jul 7, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 19, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.
-
Jun 19, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 19, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Zipperer, Montgomery, J. Ott, Petersen, Gundrum, Brooks, Townsend, Lothian, Van Roy, Petrowski, Vos, Nerison, Mursau, Spanbauer, Strachota, Bies and Gunderson;Cosponsored by Senators Carpenter, Lazich, Kanavas, Holperin, Plale, Schultz, Hansen, Olsen, Darling and Lassa
- Jun 19, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Jul 7, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate