Assembly Bill 33
Technical changes that affect the public debt amortization fund of a first class city
Topics: Debt, Public, Milwaukee: City
Became law
The governor signed it on Oct 6, 2009. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 12, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed May 13, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Sep 22, 2009
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 47
Latest entry in the official record, Oct 9, 2009: “Published 10-20-2009”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) has a public debt amortization fund (fund), which is a segregated fund that is used to help the city's management of its general obligation debt. The fund is governed by a commission.
This bill makes a number of technical changes to the operation of the fund.
Read the full summary Show less
Currently, the commission's secretary must make an annual report to the common council about the fund on or about January 15. The bill changes the date to September 30. Also under current law, and subject to some exceptions, the commission may use the fund to acquire for cancellation general obligation bonds or notes of the city prior to the maturity of such debt. Under the bill, the commission may also use the fund to make interest and principal payments on such debt without regard to the maturity of the debt.
Who's behind it
10 representatives are its . 9 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeffrey Stone · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Toles · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · May 8, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Sep 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Oct 9, 2009
The new law was published.
-
Oct 6, 2009
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 47.
-
Oct 6, 2009
Sent to the governor.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Senate passed it too.
-
Sep 3, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Aug 18, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 18, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.
-
May 13, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
May 13, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
May 8, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
May 8, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Mar 10, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 3, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 18, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 12, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.
-
Feb 12, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Fields, Stone, Sinicki, Grigsby, Richards, Staskunas, Kessler, Cullen, Toles and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Plale, Taylor and Darling
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Feb 18, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 3, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 10, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 5, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- May 8, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-13-2009 by committee on Rules
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- May 13, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 13, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- May 18, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Aug 18, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Sep 2, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Sep 3, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Sep 16, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Sep 22, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 10-5-2009
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 10-6-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 47
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Published 10-20-2009
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote