Assembly Bill 333
Limiting disclosure of information gathered by news persons
Topics: Circuit court, Criminal identification and investigation, Freedom of speech and press, Newspaper and magazine, Subpoena
Became law
The governor signed it on May 19, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 30, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Sep 22, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 20, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 400
Latest entry in the official record, May 21, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under the Supreme Court's interpretation of article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution, which prohibits any law that restrains the liberty of the press, a member of a news media has a qualified privilege to refuse to disclose sources of information received in confidence. The privilege is qualified because the reporter may be required to reveal the source if proof is presented showing that the source may have information that is competent, relevant, material, and favorable to the requester and that there are no other reasonable and adequate alternative sources for the information. The Supreme Court has held that the value of freedom of the press must be balanced against the societal values favoring disclosure, which requires a review of the facts in each case to determine whether to allow a reporter to refuse to disclose a confidential source.
This bill prohibits a person, other than a court, from issuing a subpoena compelling a news person to testify or produce information about any of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1. The identity of a confidential news source.
2. Any information that would tend to identify a confidential news source.
3. Any information obtained in confidence by a news person in gathering or preparing information for potential dissemination to the public.
4. Any other information or identity of a source of information that is obtained by a news person in gathering or preparing information for potential dissemination to the public.
The bill gives the court authority, after a hearing, to issue a subpoena to compel a news person to testify or produce information but only the evidence listed in item 4., above. The court may issue the subpoena if the person who requests the subpoena establishes by clear and convincing evidence, in a criminal investigation, that a crime has occurred, or in a civil action, that the complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted, and if all of the following conditions apply:
1. The information or identity of the source is highly relevant to the criminal investigation or civil action.
2. The information or identity of the source is critical or necessary to the maintenance of the party's claim, defense, or to the proof of an issue material to the criminal investigation or civil action.
3. The information or identity of the source of the information is not obtainable from any alternative source.
4. There is an overriding public interest in the disclosure of the information or identity of the source of the information.
The bill also restricts the issuance of a subpoena to order a person who is not a news person to testify or produce information related to a business transaction between that person and a news person if the intent is to obtain information that cannot be obtained from the news person. There are exceptions to this restriction under the bill if the information is highly relevant, necessary for the party's claim or defense, and not obtainable from other sources.
The bill allows the court, in a criminal investigation in which a news person is the subject of the investigation, to order the issuance of a subpoena at the request of the prosecutor without giving the news person advance notice of the request and a hearing if the court determines that giving advance notice would pose a substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation.
Who's behind it
12 representatives are its . All 12 are Democrats.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 20 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Kim Hixson · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (8)
- Rob Cowles · Republican, Senate
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Pat Kreitlow · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 2 · Sep 16, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 45 · Sep 22, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Dec 2, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 21, 2010
The new law was published.
-
May 19, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 400.
-
May 13, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 20, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Apr 19, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Dec 2, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 24, 2009
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Sep 23, 2009
The Senate received it.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Assembly passed it.
-
Sep 22, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Sep 16, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Sep 16, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.
-
Jul 14, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 30, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.
-
Jun 30, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Parisi, Pasch, Berceau, Hixson, Zigmunt, Jorgensen, Turner, Molepske Jr., Benedict, Sinicki, Pocan and Grigsby;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Holperin, Hansen, Schultz, Lehman, Cowles and Risser
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Jul 14, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Parisi
- Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler and Parisi
- Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Rules
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Gundrum, Vos and Zipperer
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 23, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Sep 24, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 1, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Dec 2, 2009 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Dec 2, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Senator Grothman added as a cosponsor
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 13, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 19, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 400
- May 21, 2010 · Assembly
Published 6-1-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote