Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 333

Limiting disclosure of information gathered by news persons

Topics: Circuit court, Criminal identification and investigation, Freedom of speech and press, Newspaper and magazine, Subpoena

Became law

The governor signed it on May 19, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 30, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Sep 22, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 400

Latest entry in the official record, May 21, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the Supreme Court's interpretation of article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution, which prohibits any law that restrains the liberty of the press, a member of a news media has a qualified privilege to refuse to disclose sources of information received in confidence. The privilege is qualified because the reporter may be required to reveal the source if proof is presented showing that the source may have information that is competent, relevant, material, and favorable to the requester and that there are no other reasonable and adequate alternative sources for the information. The Supreme Court has held that the value of freedom of the press must be balanced against the societal values favoring disclosure, which requires a review of the facts in each case to determine whether to allow a reporter to refuse to disclose a confidential source.

This bill prohibits a person, other than a court, from issuing a subpoena compelling a news person to testify or produce information about any of the following:

Read the full summary

1. The identity of a confidential news source.

2. Any information that would tend to identify a confidential news source.

3. Any information obtained in confidence by a news person in gathering or preparing information for potential dissemination to the public.

4. Any other information or identity of a source of information that is obtained by a news person in gathering or preparing information for potential dissemination to the public.

The bill gives the court authority, after a hearing, to issue a subpoena to compel a news person to testify or produce information but only the evidence listed in item 4., above. The court may issue the subpoena if the person who requests the subpoena establishes by clear and convincing evidence, in a criminal investigation, that a crime has occurred, or in a civil action, that the complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted, and if all of the following conditions apply:

1. The information or identity of the source is highly relevant to the criminal investigation or civil action.

2. The information or identity of the source is critical or necessary to the maintenance of the party's claim, defense, or to the proof of an issue material to the criminal investigation or civil action.

3. The information or identity of the source of the information is not obtainable from any alternative source.

4. There is an overriding public interest in the disclosure of the information or identity of the source of the information.

The bill also restricts the issuance of a subpoena to order a person who is not a news person to testify or produce information related to a business transaction between that person and a news person if the intent is to obtain information that cannot be obtained from the news person. There are exceptions to this restriction under the bill if the information is highly relevant, necessary for the party's claim or defense, and not obtainable from other sources.

The bill allows the court, in a criminal investigation in which a news person is the subject of the investigation, to order the issuance of a subpoena at the request of the prosecutor without giving the news person advance notice of the request and a hearing if the court determines that giving advance notice would pose a substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation.

Who's behind it

12 representatives are its ⁠. All 12 are Democrats.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (8)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 2 · Sep 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 45 · Sep 22, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Dec 2, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 21, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 19, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 400.

  3. May 13, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Apr 19, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  6. Dec 2, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  7. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Sep 24, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  9. Sep 23, 2009

    The Senate received it.

  10. Sep 22, 2009

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Sep 22, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Sep 16, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Sep 16, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.

  14. Jul 14, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Jun 30, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  16. Jun 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Parisi, Pasch, Berceau, Hixson, Zigmunt, Jorgensen, Turner, Molepske Jr., Benedict, Sinicki, Pocan and Grigsby;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Holperin, Hansen, Schultz, Lehman, Cowles and Risser

  2. Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Jul 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Sep 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Parisi

  5. Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  7. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  8. Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler and Parisi

  10. Sep 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-22-2009 by committee on Rules

  11. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  13. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Gundrum, Vos and Zipperer

  14. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 45

  15. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  16. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  18. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  19. Sep 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  20. Sep 23, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  21. Sep 24, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  22. Oct 29, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  23. Dec 1, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Dec 2, 2009 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  25. Dec 2, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Grothman added as a cosponsor

  28. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  31. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  32. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  35. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  36. May 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 400

  37. May 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 6-1-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote