Assembly Bill 336
Immunity from liability for, and disclosure of patient information by, a health care provider, health care facility, or employee of a health care provider or health care facility that, in good faith, reports or provides information about a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, unprofessional conduct, or negligence in treating a patient by a health care provider, health care facility, or employee or former employee of a health care provider or health care facility
Topics: Employment, Hospitals, Medical service, Physician, Privacy
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 30, 2009
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a physician who in good faith provides the Medical Examining Board with information concerning an allegation that another physician has engaged in unprofessional conduct or acted negligently in treating a patient is immune from liability for any damage that results from any act or omission in providing the information and may not be disciplined by that board for providing the information.
Also, current law prohibits retaliation or other employment discrimination against any employee of a health care facility or of a health care provider (employee) who in good faith reports any information, the disclosure of which is not expressly prohibited by law, that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the health care facility, health care provider, or an employee has committed a violation of the law or has provided a health care service of a quality that violates any standard established by law or any clinical or ethical standard established by a professionally recognized accrediting or standard-setting body (clinical or ethical standard) and that poses a potential risk to public health or safety: 1) to any appropriate state agency; 2) to any professionally recognized accrediting or standard-setting body that has accredited, certified, or otherwise approved the health care facility or health care provider (accrediting or standard-setting body); 3) to any officer or director of the health care facility or health care provider; or 4) to any employee who is in a supervisory capacity or in a position to take corrective action (supervisor). In addition, current law prohibits retaliation or other employment discrimination against any employee who initiates, participates in, or testifies in any action or proceeding in which such a violation is alleged or who provides to any legislator or legislative committee any information relating to such an alleged violation.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill provides for immunity from liability for any health care provider, health care facility, or employee that in good faith does any of the following:
1. Reports any information, the disclosure of which is not expressly prohibited by law, relating to an allegation that a health care provider, health care facility, or employee has committed a violation of the law or has provided a health care service of a quality that violates any standard established by law or any clinical or ethical standard and that poses a potential risk to public health or safety (violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard), has engaged in unprofessional conduct, or has acted negligently in treating a patient to any state agency; to any accrediting or standard-setting body; or to any officer, director, or supervisor of the health care facility or health care provider.
2. Initiates, participates in, or testifies in any action or proceeding in which it is alleged that a health care provider, health care facility, or employee has committed a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, has engaged in unprofessional conduct, or has acted negligently in treating a patient.
3. Provides to any legislator or legislative committee any information, the disclosure of which is not expressly prohibited by law, relating to an allegation that a health care provider, health care facility, or employee has committed a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, has engaged in unprofessional conduct, or has acted negligently in treating a patient.
4. Provides to any prospective employer of an employee or former employee information, the disclosure of which is not expressly prohibited by law, relating to an allegation that the employee or former employee has committed a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, has engaged in unprofessional conduct, or has acted negligently in treating a patient.
The immunity provided under the bill, however, does not apply to a health care provider, health care facility, or employee that reports or provides any information, or that initiates, participates in, or testifies in any action or proceeding based on information, that the provider, facility, or employee knows or should know is false or misleading or that concerns a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, unprofessional conduct, or negligence in treating a patient by that provider, facility, or employee.
Finally, notwithstanding the confidentiality of patient health care records under current law, the bill permits a health care provider, health care facility, or employee reporting information relating to a violation of the law or of a clinical or ethical standard, unprofessional conduct, or negligence in treating a patient to a state agency that has the authority to investigate and take action against the provider, facility, or employee for the type of conduct reported to disclose to the agency the name of the patient who is the subject of, and a description of the event giving rise to, the alleged violation, unprofessional conduct, or negligent act.
Who's behind it
4 representatives are its . All 4 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Gunderson · Republican, Assembly
- Don Pridemore · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jun 30, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.
-
Jun 30, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Pridemore, Brooks, Gunderson and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators Schultz and Lassa
- Jun 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor