Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
liability of the state for a violation of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, Fair Labor Standards Act, or Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 or of Title I of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the 11th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution and article IV, section 27,
of the Wisconsin Constitution, the state may not be sued for damages unless it has
waived its sovereign immunity. Specifically, the U.S. Supreme Court has recently
held that, unless a state has waived its sovereign immunity, the state may not be
sued for any of the following:
1. Damages for a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),
which prohibits an employer, including a state, from discriminating against an
individual on the basis of disability.
Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
, 531
U.S. 356 (2001).
2. Damages for a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967 (ADEA), which prohibits an employer, including a state, from discriminating
against an individual 40 years of age or over on the basis of age.
Kimel v. Fla. Bd.
of Regents
, 528 U.S. 62 (2000).
3. Damages for a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which
requires an employer, including a state, to pay the federal minimum wage and 1.5
times the employee's regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per
week (overtime pay).
Alden v. Maine
, 527 U.S. 706 (1999).
The U.S. Supreme Court has also recently held that a state employee may sue
for damages for a violation of the family leave provision of the federal Family and
Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA), regardless of whether the state has waived its
sovereign immunity (
Nevada Dep't of Human Resources v. Hibbs
, 538 U.S. 721
(2003)), but did not rule on whether a state employee may sue for damages for a
violation of the medical leave provision of the FMLA absent a waiver of sovereign
immunity.
This bill provides that the state may be sued in a federal or state court of
competent jurisdiction for a violation of the ADA, the ADEA, the FLSA or the FMLA
and, in an action for a violation of any of those acts, is liable for all remedies that are
available for such a violation to the same extent that a public entity other than a state
is liable.
Accordingly, under the bill, if an employee of the state sues the state for a
violation of the ADA, the ADEA, the FLSA or the FMLA, the state may be ordered
as follows:
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 5, Noes 3
Passed 5–3 Jan 21, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mason, Grigsby, Van Akkeren, Pope-Roberts, Hixson, Cullen, Benedict, Pasch, Berceau, Molepske Jr., Pocan, Roys, Soletski, Black, Schneider, Young and Turner;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Risser, Robson, Lehman, Coggs and Vinehout
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security
- Feb 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1