Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 367

Employment discrimination based on credit history

Topics: Credit, Discrimination in employment

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 22, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 12, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, arrest record, conviction record, military service, or use or nonuse of a lawful product off the employer's premises during nonworking hours. Current law also specifies that employment discrimination because of arrest record includes requesting an individual to supply information regarding any arrest record, except when employment depends on the bondability of the individual, and that employment discrimination because of conviction record does not include refusing to employ an individual who has been convicted of an offense the circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or who is not bondable when employment depends on the bondability of the individual.

This bill prohibits employment discrimination based on credit history. The bill specifies that employment discrimination because of credit history includes an employer, labor organization, employment agency, licensing agency, or other person requesting an applicant, employee, member, licensee, or any other individual, on an application form or otherwise, to authorize that person to procure the individual's credit history, except that it is not employment discrimination to request that authorization: 1) if the circumstances of an individual's credit history are substantially related to the circumstances of a particular job or licensed activity; or 2) if employment, membership, or licensing depends on the bondability of the individual and the individual may not be bondable due to his or her credit rating.

Read the full summary

The bill also specifies that it is not employment discrimination because of credit history to refuse to employ, admit, or license, or to bar or terminate from employment, membership, or licensing, any individual if: 1) the circumstances of an individual's credit history are substantially related to the circumstances of the particular job; or 2) if the individual is not bondable when bondability is required by state or federal law, administrative regulation, or established business practice of the employer.

Under the bill, "credit history" means information provided in a consumer report under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which defines "consumer report" as any written, oral, or other communication by a consumer reporting agency bearing on an individual's creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living, which is used or expected to be used as a factor in establishing the individual's eligibility for credit, insurance, employment, or any other purpose allowed under federal law. The FCRA further defines "consumer reporting agency" as any person who, for monetary fees, dues, or on a cooperative nonprofit basis, regularly engages in whole or in part in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information or other information on individuals for the purpose of furnishing consumer reports to third parties, and who uses any means or facility of interstate commerce for the purpose of preparing or furnishing consumer reports.

Who's behind it

14 representatives are its ⁠. All 14 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Workforce Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 3 · Apr 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 49 to 48 · Apr 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 49, Noes 48”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 23, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  3. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 49 to 48.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  5. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 16, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.

  7. Aug 27, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Aug 25, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Aug 12, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Workforce Development.

  10. Aug 12, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hixson, Berceau, Grigsby, Toles, Hintz, Zepnick, Pope-Roberts, Schneider, Parisi, Pasch, A. Williams, Turner, Fields and Hilgenberg;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Coggs

  2. Aug 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Workforce Development

  3. Aug 25, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hixson

  6. Oct 22, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  8. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Workforce Development, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  9. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:05 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  11. Apr 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Hixson and Staskunas

  12. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  14. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 49, Noes 48

  17. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote