Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 371

Privileges under a Class A or Class B bear hunting license, and bear carcass tag and back tag requirements

Topics: Dogs, Game: Hunting license, Holidays and special dates, Natural Resources, Department of: Hunting and fishing, Sunset, Youth

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on May 19, 2010. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 12, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 28, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed May 19, 2010.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 26, 2010: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) issues two types of bear hunting licenses. A Class A bear license allows the license holder to shoot and kill bear and to exercise the privileges of a Class B bear license. A Class B bear license allows the license holder to assist a Class A license holder in pursuing bear, to bait bear, and to train dogs to pursue bear (dog training); but it does not allow the license holder to actually shoot at or kill bear.

This bill expands the privileges of a Class B bear license. The bill authorizes the holder of a Class B bear license to shoot and kill a bear that was shot, but not killed, by another hunter holding a Class A bear license in the same hunting party if killing the bear is necessary to protect the safety of other members of the hunting party or the public. The bill also allows the holder of a Class B bear license to pursue a bear, provided that the holder of the Class B bear license does not shoot or kill the bear, unless the public safety circumstances for killing a bear shot at by another hunter apply.

Read the full summary

This bill also requires DNR to allow a person who holds a Class B bear license to engage in dog training during any part of an open season in which DNR allows a Class A bear license holder to hunt bear with the use of a dog. The bill also eliminates the requirement that holders of a Class B bear license attach a back tag to their outermost garment when engaging in the activities authorized under that license.

Current law exempts a person who is under the age of 12 years from holding a Class B bear license. This bill expands this exemption by allowing a person who is under the age of 16 years to engage in the activities authorized under a Class B bear license without holding that license. The bill also creates a new exemption that authorizes a person to engage in the activities authorized by a Class B bear license without holding the license during the third Saturday in August and the immediately following Sunday.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 5 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Fish and Wildlife vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 1 · Jan 21, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Fish and Wildlife, Ayes 9, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Apr 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 26, 2010

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. May 19, 2010

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. May 13, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Apr 20, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  7. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Apr 15, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  9. Apr 15, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Apr 14, 2010

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)

  11. Apr 14, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Apr 5, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  13. Apr 1, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Feb 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Feb 2, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources.

  16. Jan 29, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  17. Jan 28, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  18. Jan 28, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  19. Jan 21, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  20. Jan 21, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.

  21. Sep 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  22. Aug 19, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  23. Aug 12, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Fish and Wildlife.

  24. Aug 12, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Vruwink, Brooks, Gunderson, Friske, Murtha, Danou, Smith and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, Wirch, Vinehout, Olsen, Grothman, Hopper, Schultz, Hansen, Kreitlow and Cowles

  2. Aug 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Fish and Wildlife

  3. Aug 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  6. Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Fish and Wildlife, Ayes 9, Noes 1

  8. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Fish and Wildlife, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  9. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Rules

  11. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  13. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  15. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 29, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Feb 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  21. Feb 11, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Apr 1, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  23. Apr 1, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources

  25. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  26. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  28. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  29. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  30. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  31. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  32. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  34. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  35. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  36. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  37. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Natural Resources

  38. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  39. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:06 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  40. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Senate amendment 1 concurred in

  41. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  42. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  43. May 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  44. May 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 5-19-2010

  45. May 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-25-2010 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  46. May 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote