Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
excluding from taxable income gains from a Wisconsin business.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, there is an income tax exclusion for individuals for 60
percent of the net capital gains realized from the sale of assets held for at least one
year.
Under the bill, an individual; an individual partner or member of a partnership,
limited liability company, or limited liability partnership; or an individual
shareholder of a tax-option corporation (claimant) may subtract from federal
adjusted gross income the amount of capital gain, not to exceed $10,000,000 in a
taxable year, realized from the sale of any asset held more than one year (original
asset), to the extent that the gain is not already excluded from taxation.
Under the bill, the claimant must place the gain from the original asset in a
segregated account in a financial institution, must invest all of the proceeds in the
account in a Wisconsin business within 180 days after the sale of the original asset
that generated the gain, and must notify the Department of Revenue (DOR) on a
form prepared by DOR that the claimant will not declare the gain from the original
asset because the proceeds have been reinvested in a Wisconsin business.
A "Wisconsin business" is defined as a business that is headquartered in
Wisconsin; that employs at least 51 percent of its employees in this state; that is
engaged in, or is committed to engage, in businesses such as manufacturing,
agriculture, silviculture, conducting research, or developing new products or
business processes; that is not engaged in businesses such as real estate
development, insurance, banking, lobbying, political consulting, professional
services, retail, leisure, hospitality, transportation, or construction; that has fewer
than 500 employees; that has been in operation in this state for not more than seven
consecutive years; and that is not a publicly traded entity.
The bill also specifies that the basis of the investment shall be its cost minus
the gain generated by the sale of the original asset. If a claimant claims the
subtraction allowed under the bill, the claimant may not use that gain to net the
claimant's gains and losses as the claimant could do if the claimant did not claim the
subtraction.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Davis (R) , Gunderson (R) , Honadel (R) , Huebsch (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kramer (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Lothian (R) , M. Williams (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Rhoades (R) , Ripp (R) , Roth (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Suder (R) , Tauchen (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vukmir (R) , Zipperer (R)
Full history
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Strachota, Spanbauer, Ripp, Zipperer, Knodl, Brooks, Rhoades, Suder, Petersen, Davis, Roth, Tauchen, Kerkman, Van Roy, Nygren, A. Ott, Vukmir, Kramer, Kaufert, Murtha, Lothian, LeMahieu, Stone, Mursau, Gunderson, Huebsch, Honadel, M. Williams, Kleefisch, Bies and Ballweg;Cosponsored by Senators Hopper, Kanavas, Taylor, S. Fitzgerald, Darling, Leibham, Schultz, Harsdorf, Olsen and Kedzie
- Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, the Economy and Small Business
- Mar 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1