Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 394

The color and design of special distinguishing registration plates for fire fighters and emergency medical technicians

Topics: Fire department, Medical service, Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 22, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 26, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 22, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, members of authorized special groups may obtain special distinguishing registration plates for automobiles and certain other vehicles that are owned or leased by members of these groups, which include fire fighters and emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Subject to certain limitations, the Department of Transportation (DOT) specifies the color and design for special plates.

Current law also requires DOT to establish new designs for most vehicle registration plates, including most special plates, at intervals determined by DOT and to issue the new plates on a rolling basis as vehicle registrations are renewed by the vehicle owners.

Read the full summary

This bill requires special plates for fire fighters and EMTs to be the same color and design that was specified by DOT for these plates immediately prior to January 1, 2007. The bill also exempts these special plates from the redesign cycle.

Who's behind it

20 representatives are its ⁠. 15 are Republicans and 5 are Democrats.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (20)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 23, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  3. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  5. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 16, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  7. Dec 3, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Dec 2, 2009

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Oct 8, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Aug 26, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  11. Aug 26, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Lothian, Barca, Suder, Kerkman, Townsend, Gunderson, Murtha, Brooks, Nerison, Kestell, Hixson, Strachota, Davis, Ripp, Hintz, Kaufert, Zigmunt, Meyer, M. Williams and Pope-Roberts;Cosponsored by Senators Kedzie, Wirch, Grothman, Darling, Schultz, Cowles, Taylor, Carpenter, Lehman and Kapanke

  2. Aug 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Oct 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Representative Steinbrink added as a coauthor

  5. Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Lothian

  7. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  9. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  10. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 by committee on Rules

  12. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote