Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 40

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the filing of a wage claim or the bringing of a wage claim action by a collective bargaining representative on behalf of an employee and the priority of a wage claim lien over a prior lien of a commercial lending institution and over the rights of a purchaser of any property of the employer.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) must

investigate and attempt to adjust any claim by an employee that his or her employer

has not paid the employee any wages that are owed to the employee (wage claim).

Currently, DWD or an employee who brings a wage claim action has a lien upon all

property of the employer, real and personal, located in this state for the full amount

of any wages owed to the employee (wage claim lien). Currently, a wage claim lien

takes precedence over all other debts, judgments, decrees, liens, or mortgages

against an employer, except for a lien of a commercial lending institution that

originates before the wage claim lien takes effect (prior lien), regardless of whether

those other debts, judgments, decrees, liens, or mortgages originated before or after

the wage claim lien takes effect. Current law provides, however, that a wage claim

lien takes precedence over a prior lien of a commercial lending institution as to the

first $3,000 of unpaid wages covered under the wage claim lien that are earned

within the six months preceding the filing of the wage claim with DWD or the

commencement of an action by the employee to recover the wages due.

This bill eliminates that $3,000 cap and six-month time limit so that under the

bill a wage claim lien covering any amount of wages earned at any time takes

precedence over a lien of a commercial lending institution, regardless of whether the

lien of the commercial lending institution originated before or after the wage claim

lien takes effect.

The bill also provides that a wage claim lien takes precedence over the rights

of any purchaser of any property of the employer, including any bona fide purchaser

that purchases the property of the employer at the time of commencement of a

bankruptcy proceeding, that is, the trustee in bankruptcy. This change reverses

In

Re Globe Building Materials, Inc.,

463 F. 3d 631 (7th Cir. 2006), which held that the

trustee in bankruptcy could avoid a wage claim lien because under the current wage

claim lien law a wage claim does not expressly take precedence over the rights of a

bona fide purchaser under the federal bankruptcy law.

Finally, the bill permits a recognized or certified collective bargaining

representative of an employee to file a wage claim with DWD, or to bring a wage claim

action in court, on behalf of an employee and grants a wage claim lien to a collective

bargaining representative that brings a wage claim action.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Black (D) , Cullen (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Parisi (D) , Richards (D) , Sinicki (D) , Soletski (D) , Staskunas (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Toles (D) , Turner (D) , Van Akkeren (D) , Zepnick (D)

13 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Coggs (D) , Decker (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Holperin (D) , Kreitlow (D) , Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Plale (D) , Robson (D) , Taylor (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3

Passed 5–3 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Garthwaite, Sinicki, Berceau, Black, Cullen, Grigsby, Hilgenberg, Jorgensen, Kessler, Mason, Parisi, Richards, Soletski, Staskunas, Steinbrink, Toles, Turner, Van Akkeren, Zepnick and Bernard Schaber;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Robson, Hansen, Carpenter, Coggs, Decker, Erpenbach, Holperin, Kreitlow, Miller, Plale, Taylor and Wirch

  2. Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 19, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Nass

  6. Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Garthwaite

  7. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1