Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 402

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

the operation of neighborhood electric vehicles on county trunk highways.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a "neighborhood electric vehicle" (NEV) is a motor vehicle

that is propelled by electric power and that meets certain standards for low-speed

vehicles under federal law, but does not include a golf cart. A municipality may, by

ordinance, allow the use of NEVs on roadways under its jurisdiction that have a

speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less. However, a municipal ordinance may not

allow the use of NEVs on connecting highways within the municipality, or where the

municipality's roadways cross state trunk highways, unless all of the following

apply: 1) the municipality provides written notice to the Department of

Transportation (DOT) of the ordinance, including identification of any connecting

highway or state trunk highway intersection to which the ordinance will apply; and

2) within 21 days of receiving this notice, DOT consents or fails to object to the use

of NEVs on the connecting highway or through the intersection crossing the state

trunk highway.

This bill expands municipal authority to allow operation of NEVs on roadways

within the municipality. Under the bill, a municipal ordinance may allow the use of

NEVs on county trunk highways located within the municipality's territorial

boundaries if all of the following apply: 1) the municipality provides written notice

of the ordinance to the governing body of the county having jurisdiction over the

highway, including identification of any county trunk highway to which the

ordinance will apply; and 2) within 21 days of receiving this notice, the governing

body of the county, or the county highway commissioner or county highway

committee if designated by the governing body of the county to act on its behalf,

consents or fails to object to the use of NEVs on the county trunk highway.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Hilgenberg (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kaufert (R) , Radcliffe (D) , Sherman , Townsend (R)

6 cosponsors

A. Lasee (R) , Cowles (R) , Holperin (D) , Olsen (R) , S. Fitzgerald (R) , Schultz (R)

Full history

  1. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives A. Ott, Ballweg, Bies, Hilgenberg, Jorgensen, Kaufert, Radcliffe, Sherman and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators A. Lasee, Cowles, S. Fitzgerald, Olsen, Schultz and Holperin

  2. Aug 31, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Oct 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1